@@ -979,7 +979,8 @@ static abi_long do_pipe2(int host_pipe[], int flags)
#endif
}
-static abi_long do_pipe(void *cpu_env, abi_ulong pipedes, int flags)
+static abi_long do_pipe(void *cpu_env, abi_ulong pipedes,
+ int flags, int is_pipe2)
{
int host_pipe[2];
abi_long ret;
@@ -987,20 +988,25 @@ static abi_long do_pipe(void *cpu_env, abi_ulong pipedes, int flags)
if (is_error(ret))
return get_errno(ret);
-#if defined(TARGET_MIPS)
- ((CPUMIPSState*)cpu_env)->active_tc.gpr[3] = host_pipe[1];
- ret = host_pipe[0];
-#else
-#if defined(TARGET_SH4)
- if (!flags) {
+
+ /* Several targets have special calling conventions for the original
+ pipe syscall, but didn't replicate this into the pipe2 syscall. */
+ if (!is_pipe2) {
+#if defined(TARGET_ALPHA)
+ ((CPUAlphaState *)cpu_env)->ir[IR_A4] = host_pipe[1];
+ return host_pipe[0];
+#elif defined(TARGET_MIPS)
+ ((CPUMIPSState*)cpu_env)->active_tc.gpr[3] = host_pipe[1];
+ return host_pipe[0];
+#elif defined(TARGET_SH4)
((CPUSH4State*)cpu_env)->gregs[1] = host_pipe[1];
- ret = host_pipe[0];
- } else
+ return host_pipe[0];
#endif
+ }
+
if (put_user_s32(host_pipe[0], pipedes)
|| put_user_s32(host_pipe[1], pipedes + sizeof(host_pipe[0])))
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
-#endif
return get_errno(ret);
}
@@ -4690,11 +4696,11 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1,
ret = get_errno(dup(arg1));
break;
case TARGET_NR_pipe:
- ret = do_pipe(cpu_env, arg1, 0);
+ ret = do_pipe(cpu_env, arg1, 0, 0);
break;
#ifdef TARGET_NR_pipe2
case TARGET_NR_pipe2:
- ret = do_pipe(cpu_env, arg1, arg2);
+ ret = do_pipe(cpu_env, arg1, arg2, 1);
break;
#endif
case TARGET_NR_times:
At the same time, tidy the code wrt MIPS and SH4 which have the same two register return mechanism. Fix confusion between pipe and pipe2 with an explicit flags=0, when the guest will not be using the two register return mechanism. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> --- linux-user/syscall.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)