| Message ID | cover.1616000692.git.berto@igalia.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Allow changing bs->file on reopen | expand |
Hi Alberto! What are your plans for v5? I'm now finishing a new series which makes backup-top filter public, and I want to base it on your series (otherwise I can't add a test). 17.03.2021 20:15, Alberto Garcia wrote: > Based-on: <20210317143529.615584-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> > > Hello, > > this is the same as v3, but rebased on top of Vladimir's "block: > update graph permissions update v3", which you can get here: > > git: https://src.openvz.org/scm/~vsementsov/qemu.git > tag: up-block-topologic-perm-v3 > > Tip: you may find it easier to review patch 4 if you use 'git diff -w' > since a big part of the changes that you see in > qmp_x_blockdev_reopen() are just indentation changes. > > Berto > > v4: > - Rebase on top of version 3 of Vladimir's branch > v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-03/msg00553.html > v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-02/msg00623.html > v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-01/msg00437.html > > Output of git backport-diff against v3: > > Key: > [----] : patches are identical > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch > [down] : patch is downstream-only > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively > > 001/6:[----] [--] 'block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free()' > 002/6:[0018] [FC] 'block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen' > 003/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen' > 004/6:[0071] [FC] 'block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen' > 005/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time' > 006/6:[----] [-C] 'block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API' > > Alberto Garcia (6): > block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free() > block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen > iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen > block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen > iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time > block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API > > qapi/block-core.json | 24 ++--- > include/block/block.h | 2 + > block.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++---------- > blockdev.c | 78 +++++++++------ > tests/qemu-iotests/155 | 9 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/165 | 4 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/245 | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > tests/qemu-iotests/245.out | 11 ++- > tests/qemu-iotests/248 | 4 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/248.out | 2 +- > tests/qemu-iotests/296 | 11 ++- > tests/qemu-iotests/298 | 4 +- > 12 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) >
Am 14.05.2021 um 17:53 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: > Hi Alberto! > > What are your plans for v5? I'm now finishing a new series which makes > backup-top filter public, and I want to base it on your series > (otherwise I can't add a test). Berto, where are we with this? I see that Vladimir picked up one or two patches for his series, but I think we still need a v5 at least for the rest? If you can't find the time, should someone else pick up all patches? Kevin > 17.03.2021 20:15, Alberto Garcia wrote: > > Based-on: <20210317143529.615584-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> > > > > Hello, > > > > this is the same as v3, but rebased on top of Vladimir's "block: > > update graph permissions update v3", which you can get here: > > > > git: https://src.openvz.org/scm/~vsementsov/qemu.git > > tag: up-block-topologic-perm-v3 > > > > Tip: you may find it easier to review patch 4 if you use 'git diff -w' > > since a big part of the changes that you see in > > qmp_x_blockdev_reopen() are just indentation changes. > > > > Berto > > > > v4: > > - Rebase on top of version 3 of Vladimir's branch > > v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-03/msg00553.html > > v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-02/msg00623.html > > v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-01/msg00437.html > > > > Output of git backport-diff against v3: > > > > Key: > > [----] : patches are identical > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch > > [down] : patch is downstream-only > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively > > > > 001/6:[----] [--] 'block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free()' > > 002/6:[0018] [FC] 'block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen' > > 003/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen' > > 004/6:[0071] [FC] 'block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen' > > 005/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time' > > 006/6:[----] [-C] 'block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API' > > > > Alberto Garcia (6): > > block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free() > > block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen > > iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen > > block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen > > iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time > > block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API > > > > qapi/block-core.json | 24 ++--- > > include/block/block.h | 2 + > > block.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++---------- > > blockdev.c | 78 +++++++++------ > > tests/qemu-iotests/155 | 9 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/165 | 4 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/245 | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > tests/qemu-iotests/245.out | 11 ++- > > tests/qemu-iotests/248 | 4 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/248.out | 2 +- > > tests/qemu-iotests/296 | 11 ++- > > tests/qemu-iotests/298 | 4 +- > > 12 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Vladimir >
09.06.2021 18:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 14.05.2021 um 17:53 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: >> Hi Alberto! >> >> What are your plans for v5? I'm now finishing a new series which makes >> backup-top filter public, and I want to base it on your series >> (otherwise I can't add a test). > > Berto, where are we with this? I see that Vladimir picked up one or two > patches for his series, but I think we still need a v5 at least for the > rest? > > If you can't find the time, should someone else pick up all patches? > > Kevin My "[PATCH v5 0/9] Allow changing bs->file on reopen" supersedes the "subject" part of the series. I think we now should start from taking it. Hmm, and I should check, does it conflict with recently merged block-permission-folloup and with beginning of "[PATCH v4 00/35] block: publish backup-top filter" which is already almost reviewed by Max and should land soon I hope (ohh, seems I should issue v5 for python conflictes). So, I propose the following plan: 1. I'll rebase and send "block: publish backup-top filter" series today-tomorrow. It's big, and mostly reviewed, let's not lose r-bs by rebases. 2. I'll rebase and send if needed (if it conflicts with master and/or [1]) "[PATCH v5 0/9] Allow changing bs->file on reopen" 3. Then we'll decide what to do with the rest. Finally, I can take it if I have some time (the head is spinning from the number of tasks ;) I also think that we can drop x- prefix even without supporting of multiple reopen, and implement it later as an option. QAPI interface is powerful enough for such enhancements. > >> 17.03.2021 20:15, Alberto Garcia wrote: >>> Based-on: <20210317143529.615584-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> this is the same as v3, but rebased on top of Vladimir's "block: >>> update graph permissions update v3", which you can get here: >>> >>> git: https://src.openvz.org/scm/~vsementsov/qemu.git >>> tag: up-block-topologic-perm-v3 >>> >>> Tip: you may find it easier to review patch 4 if you use 'git diff -w' >>> since a big part of the changes that you see in >>> qmp_x_blockdev_reopen() are just indentation changes. >>> >>> Berto >>> >>> v4: >>> - Rebase on top of version 3 of Vladimir's branch >>> v3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-03/msg00553.html >>> v2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-02/msg00623.html >>> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-01/msg00437.html >>> >>> Output of git backport-diff against v3: >>> >>> Key: >>> [----] : patches are identical >>> [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch >>> [down] : patch is downstream-only >>> The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively >>> >>> 001/6:[----] [--] 'block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free()' >>> 002/6:[0018] [FC] 'block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen' >>> 003/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen' >>> 004/6:[0071] [FC] 'block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen' >>> 005/6:[----] [--] 'iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time' >>> 006/6:[----] [-C] 'block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API' >>> >>> Alberto Garcia (6): >>> block: Add bdrv_reopen_queue_free() >>> block: Allow changing bs->file on reopen >>> iotests: Test replacing files with x-blockdev-reopen >>> block: Support multiple reopening with x-blockdev-reopen >>> iotests: Test reopening multiple devices at the same time >>> block: Make blockdev-reopen stable API >>> >>> qapi/block-core.json | 24 ++--- >>> include/block/block.h | 2 + >>> block.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++---------- >>> blockdev.c | 78 +++++++++------ >>> tests/qemu-iotests/155 | 9 +- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/165 | 4 +- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/245 | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/245.out | 11 ++- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/248 | 4 +- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/248.out | 2 +- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/296 | 11 ++- >>> tests/qemu-iotests/298 | 4 +- >>> 12 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Vladimir >> >
09.06.2021 19:40, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > 09.06.2021 18:53, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 14.05.2021 um 17:53 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben: >>> Hi Alberto! >>> >>> What are your plans for v5? I'm now finishing a new series which makes >>> backup-top filter public, and I want to base it on your series >>> (otherwise I can't add a test). >> >> Berto, where are we with this? I see that Vladimir picked up one or two >> patches for his series, but I think we still need a v5 at least for the >> rest? >> >> If you can't find the time, should someone else pick up all patches? >> >> Kevin > > My "[PATCH v5 0/9] Allow changing bs->file on reopen" supersedes the "subject" part of the series. I think we now should start from taking it. Hmm, and I should check, does it conflict with recently merged block-permission-folloup and with beginning of "[PATCH v4 00/35] block: publish backup-top filter" which is already almost reviewed by Max and should land soon I hope (ohh, seems I should issue v5 for python conflictes). > > So, I propose the following plan: > > 1. I'll rebase and send "block: publish backup-top filter" series today-tomorrow. It's big, and mostly reviewed, let's not lose r-bs by rebases. > > 2. I'll rebase and send if needed (if it conflicts with master and/or [1]) "[PATCH v5 0/9] Allow changing bs->file on reopen" > > 3. Then we'll decide what to do with the rest. Finally, I can take it if I have some time (the head is spinning from the number of tasks ;) > > I also think that we can drop x- prefix even without supporting of multiple reopen, and implement it later as an option. QAPI interface is powerful enough for such enhancements. > [1] and [2] done, patches sent. Finally, "[PATCH v6 0/9] Allow changing bs->file on reopen" depends only on two first simple patches of "[PATCH v5 00/35] block: publish backup-top filter", so the series may go in parallel.