From patchwork Tue Oct 17 17:23:02 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Juan Quintela X-Patchwork-Id: 1850319 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ZmsnFbDF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S916q6lpJz1ypX for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 04:24:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsnmp-00019V-5X; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:23:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsnmn-0000zs-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:23:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qsnml-0005AV-Up for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:23:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1697563395; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XBr2wEQ9mwn8U7TUD3O+ZnqNmcf3c9WXUDZwMSjbxvQ=; b=ZmsnFbDFoIPjKBXGHpVr8D0pY5EWUBhj67poqtpHqhIjA/gVfhJ1+L6zCpDOx2L49ik1Vk L+d7xo/aXbmTAwl3ge2ufM9ZsZusIRGS4TGJW1nHvzi0cNMAb/F3TSqNG2KSrs+oOR7p5U xb1sAtr7YiYgR7u8Yo5zwGVuRyfTfzg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-459-jzUSCcV0O6qR3rYi_7C4VQ-1; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:23:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jzUSCcV0O6qR3rYi_7C4VQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AE81029F4D; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 17:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.mitica (unknown [10.39.194.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333D492BEE; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 17:23:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Fabiano Rosas , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Leonardo Bras , Juan Quintela , Peter Xu , Markus Armbruster , Fam Zheng , Stefan Hajnoczi , Eric Blake Subject: [PATCH v6 0/5] Migration deprecated parts Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 19:23:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20231017172307.22858-1-quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=quintela@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Based on: Message-ID: <20231017083003.15951-1-quintela@redhat.com> Migration 20231017 patches On this v6: - Fixed Markus comments - 1st patch is reviewed - dropped the RFC ones. Later, Juan. On this v5: - Rebased on top of last migration pull requesnt: - address markus comments. Basically we recommend always blockdev-mirror + NBD. In deprecated.rst we also put the posiblity of using block-incremental and block, but we state that they are also deprecated. I know, I know, I deprecated them in the following patch. - Dropped the removal of block-migration and block-incremental I am only interested in showing why I want to remove the -b/-i options. Please review. Later, Juan. On this v4: - addressed all markus comments. - rebased on latest. - improve formatting of migration.json - print block migration status when needed. - patches 7-10 are not mean to merge, they just show why we want to deprecate block migration and remove its support. - Patch 7 just drop support for -i/-b and qmp equivalents. - Patch 8 shows all the helpers and convolutions we need to have to support that -i and -d. - patch 9 drops block-incremental migration support. - patch 9 drops block migration support. Please review. Thanks, Juan. On this v3: - Rebase on top of upstream. - Changed v8.1 to 8.2 (I left the reviewed by anyways) - missing the block deprecation code, please. Please, review. Later, Juan. On this v2: - dropped -incoming deprecation Paolo came with a better solution using keyvalues. - skipped field is already ready for next pull request, so dropped. - dropped the RFC bits, nermal PATCH. - Assessed all the review comments. - Added indentation of migration.json. - Used the documentation pointer to substitute block migration. Please review. [v1] Hi this series describe the migration parts that have to be deprecated. - It is an rfc because I doubt that I did the deprecation process right. Hello Markus O:-) - skipped field: It is older than me, I have never know what it stands for. As far as I know it has always been zero. - inc/blk migrate command options. They are only used by block migration (that I deprecate on the following patch). And they are really bad. grep must_remove_block_options. - block migration. block jobs, whatever they are called this week are way more flexible. Current code works, but we broke it here and there, and really nobody has stand up to maintain it. It is quite contained and can be left there. Is anyone really using it? - old compression method. It don't work. See last try from Lukas to make a test that works reliabely. I failed with the same task years ago. It is really slow, and if compression is good for you, multifd + zlib is going to perform/compress way more. I don't know what to do with this code, really. * Remove it for this release? It don't work, and haven't work reliabely in quite a few time. * Deprecate it and remove in another couple of releases, i.e. normal deprecation. * Ideas? - -incoming if you need to set parameters (multifd cames to mind, and preempt has the same problem), you really needs to use defer. So what should we do here? This part is not urget, because management apps have a working option that are already using "defer", and the code simplifacation if we remove it is not so big. So we can leave it until 9.0 or whatever we think fit. What do you think? Later, Juan. Juan Quintela (5): migration: Print block status when needed migration: migrate 'inc' command option is deprecated. migration: migrate 'blk' command option is deprecated. migration: Deprecate block migration migration: Deprecate old compression method docs/about/deprecated.rst | 36 +++++++++++++ qapi/migration.json | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- migration/block.c | 3 ++ migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c | 15 ++++-- migration/migration.c | 10 ++++ migration/options.c | 22 +++++++- 6 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)