Message ID | 20230601161347.1803440-1-berrange@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | tests/qtest: make migration-test massively faster | expand |
On 01/06/2023 18.13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > This makes migration-test faster by observing that most of the pre-copy > tests don't need to be doing a live migration. They get sufficient code > coverage with the guest CPUs paused. > > On my machine this cuts the overall execution time of migration-test > from 13 minutes, down to 8 minutes, without sacrificing any noticeable > code coverage. > > Of the tests which do still run in live mode, some need to guarantee > a certain number of iterions. This is achieved by running the 1 > iteration with an incredibly small bandwidth and max downtime to > prevent convergance, and watching query-migrate for the reported > iteration to increment. This guarantees that all the tests take at > least 30 seconds to run per iteration required. > > Watching for the iteration counter to flip is inefficient and not > actually needed, except on the final iteration before starting > convergance. On this final iteration we merely need to prove that > some amount of already transferred data has been made dirty again. > This in turn will guarantee that a further iteration is required > beyond the current one. This proof is easy to achieve by monitoring > the values at two distinct addresses in guest RAM, and can cut the > 30 second duration down to 1 second for one of the iterations. > > After this this second optimization the runtime is reduced from > 8 minutes, down to 1 minute 40 seconds, which is pretty decent given > the amount of coverage we're getting. It's now ~1 week until the soft freeze, and the migration test still run for ~8 minutes. This is still quite annoying. Could we please get one of the solutions merged before the soft freeze, either Daniel's or Peter's ? Thanks, Thomas