From patchwork Fri Mar 4 15:37:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hanna Czenczek X-Patchwork-Id: 1601218 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=VqZKHODF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K9CFn2mHFz9sFy for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 02:58:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53276 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQAKO-00041W-Bx for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:58:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQ9zy-0007WC-Vh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:37:44 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:58946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQ9zv-0007Vq-Hz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:37:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1646408258; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gDdRkUnod/NcaQxPcSnNZzWITrRwLpABy1Tl3VRgZ+Y=; b=VqZKHODF8WlF5G4492DCs9jlpY3r3SAUlksLpnDaW+ZJjr7XigRlWiSmlqLqFqDaG6n37e 9nhScvvw0ZAjlQMv9huysPZKoyutBVik5ZAF0Q3godRXwSxQM3h2ANloR1NxJytN6pfF0u 6If9C4GzpsbR2ioAgMkB/6gZqXR/fCI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-591-NZCTFmFxODya8yc7jKDO4A-1; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:37:36 -0500 X-MC-Unique: NZCTFmFxODya8yc7jKDO4A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC493824FA8; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.145]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20EB783592; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 15:37:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Hanna Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 0/5] block/amend: Fix failures seen in iotest 296 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 16:37:24 +0100 Message-Id: <20220304153729.711387-1-hreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hreitz@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=hreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.082, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito , Hanna Reitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi, I’ve tried basing my block branch on Kevin’s and noticed that after “crypto: perform permission checks under BQL”, iotest 296 was failing. I/We have debugged those failures and here are fixes for it. Hence, this series is based on Kevin’s block branch (efa33ed9b298d39e2b8c19c5f4bdd80a3b632260 at the time of writing this cover letter). I’ve pushed it here: https://gitlab.com/hreitz/qemu/-/commits/amend-job-fixes-v1 Patch 1 adds clean-up of the amend job in an error path that said commit adds to qmp_x_blockdev_amend(). Patch 2 changes the type of a JobDriver callback added in that commit; together with patch 3, this is kind of a matter of style, but it can also replace patch 3 and fix the bug that it fixes in another way. Patch 3 fixes a permission bug: When changing the permissions fails before amend, block/crypto will still keep updating_keys to be true. Without patch 2, that will remains so indefinitely and then block_crypto_child_perms() will continue to unshare the CONSISTENT_READ permission, which is wrong. (Patch 2 fixes this problem, too, specifically because with it, block_crypto_amend_cleanup() will always be called when the job is dismissed, and so updating_keys will be reset at least then.) Patch 4 fixes an issue that’s not related to “crypto: perform permission checks under BQL”, but it became appearent only while debugging the other issues here, so it’s part of this series, too. Patch 5 fixes the test itself. It expects permission-related errors to occur when the job is already running, not as an immediate result of the QMP x-blockdev-amend command. “crypto: perform permission checks under BQL” has changed this, so the test needs to take that into account. Ideally, I believe the following patches should be squashed into “crypto: perform permission checks under BQL” lest bisect breaks: - Patch 1 - Patch 2 or 3 (or both) - Patch 5 But if that isn’t feasible, we can just take the whole series on top. Hanna Reitz (5): block/amend: Clean up job on early failure block/amend: Always call .bdrv_amend_clean() block/crypto: Reset updating_keys on perm failure block/amend: Keep strong reference to BDS iotests/296: Accept early failure block/amend.c | 8 ++++++-- block/crypto.c | 8 +++++++- tests/qemu-iotests/296 | 8 ++++++-- tests/qemu-iotests/296.out | 17 +++++------------ 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)