mbox series

[0/1] hw: Add compat machines for 6.2

Message ID 20210831015426.101188-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com
Headers show
Series hw: Add compat machines for 6.2 | expand

Message

wangyanan (Y) Aug. 31, 2021, 1:54 a.m. UTC
This patch adds 6.2 machine types for arm/i440fx/q35/s390x/spapr,
which is originally from [1]. Here resend it separately and hopefully
it can get into upstream first, so that some other patches currently
on the mail list which depend on 6.2 machine compat stuff can be
rebased on this.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210823122804.7692-7-wangyanan55@huawei.com/

Yanan Wang (1):
  hw: Add compat machines for 6.2

 hw/arm/virt.c              |  9 ++++++++-
 hw/core/machine.c          |  3 +++
 hw/i386/pc.c               |  3 +++
 hw/i386/pc_piix.c          | 14 +++++++++++++-
 hw/i386/pc_q35.c           | 13 ++++++++++++-
 hw/ppc/spapr.c             | 15 +++++++++++++--
 hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 include/hw/boards.h        |  3 +++
 include/hw/i386/pc.h       |  3 +++
 9 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Maydell Sept. 1, 2021, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 02:54, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds 6.2 machine types for arm/i440fx/q35/s390x/spapr,
> which is originally from [1]. Here resend it separately and hopefully
> it can get into upstream first, so that some other patches currently
> on the mail list which depend on 6.2 machine compat stuff can be
> rebased on this.

Thanks for resending this; I'm doing an arm pullreq today so I'll
put it in with that.

-- PMM
wangyanan (Y) Sept. 1, 2021, 9:29 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2021/9/1 16:02, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 02:54, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds 6.2 machine types for arm/i440fx/q35/s390x/spapr,
>> which is originally from [1]. Here resend it separately and hopefully
>> it can get into upstream first, so that some other patches currently
>> on the mail list which depend on 6.2 machine compat stuff can be
>> rebased on this.
> Thanks for resending this; I'm doing an arm pullreq today so I'll
> put it in with that.
>
Thanks!

Yanan
.