Message ID | 20200120101023.16030-1-drjones@redhat.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | target/arm/kvm: Adjust virtual time | expand |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 10:10, Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > v3: > - Added a target/arm/kvm_arm.h comment cleanup patch (1/6) > - Minor refactoring of assert_has_feature_enabled/disabled in 4/6, > kept Richard's r-b. > - Rewrote kvm-no-adjvtime documentation in 6/6. > - Reworked approach in 5/6 to properly deal with migration and to > track running vs. !running, rather than running vs. paused states. Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 11:10 +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > v3: > - Added a target/arm/kvm_arm.h comment cleanup patch (1/6) > - Minor refactoring of assert_has_feature_enabled/disabled in 4/6, > kept Richard's r-b. > - Rewrote kvm-no-adjvtime documentation in 6/6. > - Reworked approach in 5/6 to properly deal with migration and to > track running vs. !running, rather than running vs. paused states. Probably too late since Peter already queued the series, but FWIW Tested-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2020 at 11:40, Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 11:10 +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > > v3: > > - Added a target/arm/kvm_arm.h comment cleanup patch (1/6) > > - Minor refactoring of assert_has_feature_enabled/disabled in 4/6, > > kept Richard's r-b. > > - Rewrote kvm-no-adjvtime documentation in 6/6. > > - Reworked approach in 5/6 to properly deal with migration and to > > track running vs. !running, rather than running vs. paused states. > > Probably too late since Peter already queued the series, but FWIW > > Tested-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> Yeah, the commits hit master yesterday evening -- but the testing is useful and appreciated even if we didn't manage to get your tag into git... thanks -- PMM