@@ -8569,7 +8569,7 @@ static int nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
struct list_head *hook_list,
struct nft_flowtable *flowtable)
{
- struct nft_hook *hook, *hook2, *next;
+ struct nft_hook *hook, *next;
struct nft_flowtable *ft;
int err, i = 0;
@@ -8578,12 +8578,9 @@ static int nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
if (!nft_is_active_next(net, ft))
continue;
- list_for_each_entry(hook2, &ft->hook_list, list) {
- if (hook->ops.dev == hook2->ops.dev &&
- hook->ops.pf == hook2->ops.pf) {
- err = -EEXIST;
- goto err_unregister_net_hooks;
- }
+ if (nft_hook_list_find(&ft->hook_list, hook)) {
+ err = -EEXIST;
+ goto err_unregister_net_hooks;
}
}
When checking for duplicate hooks in nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks(), comparing ops.pf value is pointless as it is always NFPROTO_NETDEV with flowtable hooks. Dropping the check leaves the search identical to the one in nft_hook_list_find() so call that function instead of open coding. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 11 ++++------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)