@@ -1674,6 +1674,7 @@ struct nft_trans_rule {
struct nft_trans_set {
struct nft_trans_binding nft_trans_binding;
+ struct list_head list_trans_newset;
struct nft_set *set;
u32 set_id;
u32 gc_int;
@@ -1875,6 +1876,7 @@ static inline int nft_request_module(struct net *net, const char *fmt, ...) { re
struct nftables_pernet {
struct list_head tables;
struct list_head commit_list;
+ struct list_head commit_set_list;
struct list_head binding_list;
struct list_head module_list;
struct list_head notify_list;
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static void nft_trans_commit_list_add_tail(struct net *net, struct nft_trans *tr
{
struct nftables_pernet *nft_net = nft_pernet(net);
struct nft_trans_binding *binding;
+ struct nft_trans_set *trans_set;
list_add_tail(&trans->list, &nft_net->commit_list);
@@ -402,9 +403,13 @@ static void nft_trans_commit_list_add_tail(struct net *net, struct nft_trans *tr
switch (trans->msg_type) {
case NFT_MSG_NEWSET:
+ trans_set = nft_trans_container_set(trans);
+
if (!nft_trans_set_update(trans) &&
nft_set_is_anonymous(nft_trans_set(trans)))
list_add_tail(&binding->binding_list, &nft_net->binding_list);
+
+ list_add_tail(&trans_set->list_trans_newset, &nft_net->commit_set_list);
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWCHAIN:
if (!nft_trans_chain_update(trans) &&
@@ -611,6 +616,7 @@ static int __nft_trans_set_add(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, int msg_type,
trans_set = nft_trans_container_set(trans);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&trans_set->nft_trans_binding.binding_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&trans_set->list_trans_newset);
if (msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWSET && ctx->nla[NFTA_SET_ID] && !desc) {
nft_trans_set_id(trans) =
@@ -4473,17 +4479,16 @@ static struct nft_set *nft_set_lookup_byid(const struct net *net,
{
struct nftables_pernet *nft_net = nft_pernet(net);
u32 id = ntohl(nla_get_be32(nla));
- struct nft_trans *trans;
+ struct nft_trans_set *trans;
- list_for_each_entry(trans, &nft_net->commit_list, list) {
- if (trans->msg_type == NFT_MSG_NEWSET) {
- struct nft_set *set = nft_trans_set(trans);
+ /* its likely the id we need is at the tail, not at start */
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(trans, &nft_net->commit_set_list, list_trans_newset) {
+ struct nft_set *set = trans->set;
- if (id == nft_trans_set_id(trans) &&
- set->table == table &&
- nft_active_genmask(set, genmask))
- return set;
- }
+ if (id == trans->set_id &&
+ set->table == table &&
+ nft_active_genmask(set, genmask))
+ return set;
}
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
@@ -10378,6 +10383,7 @@ static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
nft_flow_rule_destroy(nft_trans_flow_rule(trans));
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWSET:
+ list_del(&nft_trans_container_set(trans)->list_trans_newset);
if (nft_trans_set_update(trans)) {
struct nft_set *set = nft_trans_set(trans);
@@ -10686,6 +10692,7 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
nft_trans_destroy(trans);
break;
case NFT_MSG_NEWSET:
+ list_del(&nft_trans_container_set(trans)->list_trans_newset);
if (nft_trans_set_update(trans)) {
nft_trans_destroy(trans);
break;
@@ -10781,6 +10788,8 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
}
}
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&nft_net->commit_set_list));
+
nft_set_abort_update(&set_update_list);
synchronize_rcu();
@@ -11595,6 +11604,7 @@ static int __net_init nf_tables_init_net(struct net *net)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->tables);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->commit_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->commit_set_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->binding_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->module_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nft_net->notify_list);
@@ -11625,6 +11635,7 @@ static void __net_exit nf_tables_exit_net(struct net *net)
gc_seq = nft_gc_seq_begin(nft_net);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&nft_net->commit_list));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&nft_net->commit_set_list));
if (!list_empty(&nft_net->module_list))
nf_tables_module_autoload_cleanup(net);
nft_set_lookup_byid() is very slow when transaction becomes large, due to walk of the transaction list. Add a dedicated list that contains only the new sets. Before: nft -f ruleset 0.07s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 1:04.84 total After: nft -f ruleset 0.07s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 30.115 total .. where ruleset contains ~10 sets with ~100k elements. The above number is for a combined flush+reload of the ruleset. With previous flush, even the first NEWELEM has to walk through a few hundred thousands of DELSET(ELEM) transactions before the first NEWSET object. To cope with random-order-newset-newsetelem we'd need to replace commit_set_list with a hashtable. Expectation is that a NEWELEM operation refers to the most recently added set, so last entry of the dedicated list should be the set we want. NB: This is not a bug fix per se (functionality is fine), but with larger transaction batches list search takes forever, so it would be nice to speed this up for -stable too, hence adding a "fixes" tag. Fixes: 958bee14d071 ("netfilter: nf_tables: use new transaction infrastructure to handle sets") Reported-by: Nadia Pinaeva <n.m.pinaeva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> --- include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++ net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)