From patchwork Sun Dec 1 09:36:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zorro Lang X-Patchwork-Id: 2017207 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=lists.linux.it header.i=@lists.linux.it header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=picard header.b=WE+chbVJ; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=KMIwFkPM; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it (client-ip=2001:1418:10:5::2; helo=picard.linux.it; envelope-from=ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [IPv6:2001:1418:10:5::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y24Sv2C9Cz1yQN for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 00:31:58 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lists.linux.it; i=@lists.linux.it; q=dns/txt; s=picard; t=1733146316; h=to : date : message-id : mime-version : subject : list-id : list-unsubscribe : list-archive : list-post : list-help : list-subscribe : from : reply-to : cc : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : sender : from; bh=8KM831GEFJNxHvol7WjVd4Y60DhlocTuBV/e0jXgV2Y=; b=WE+chbVJ7FhVYz5+t5FTY2Vri3iWeQAiC1QA8mD1D26YrjA26FqAi6jp5+i+bhC1weS44 wQr/nmbI/yKZMSG0DFKhLcIx3zHV/AsxrQfc4jtw/LVScSz0MffCHmV7RLXtUcPnXG3jPfI tKr5jnJUgbZKEyo3S0RLExxYyuaXmXM= Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA843DD45A for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:31:56 +0100 (CET) X-Original-To: ltp@lists.linux.it Delivered-To: ltp@picard.linux.it Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907353DC586 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:36:14 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=zlang@kernel.org; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBCF5619DD3 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 10:36:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA85C5E99; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12837C4CECF; Sun, 1 Dec 2024 09:36:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1733045770; bh=lB+n7whgH/n5VB95xkecNn+qN4Edltxk65mTNO9GcuQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=KMIwFkPMQ8zslzNAOc+6wPRDEKsOAEwMeuMFKRB2ycGuUyEoypVY8My6wd1fjcKxB k+U6n3keJvW7n3YGyE5FJKiZ+LiYa6sFhmkU/BeiLL4reMqw7P5zU0KUU8FbVJCCHV pY/aNqz3d8LZHGqq/14SsRuMnd/c90Wou41tYmgVy7FyBp/Yl3RXLs70giwZ2ivDmo 0MMdkeveCv2SMbMww5ZqhpkS+S6jqJ3HZPNTfR913KLwxzxJ+kW8rmTBt3mcpzEwHA gyROky50Efez7rkrXf9mtv/X1+83Bua9MkRNq0Ns760ixvQnY+/WB2s29PdU6D9omn NAOZJFOEu4N5Q== To: ltp@lists.linux.it Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 17:36:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20241201093606.68993-1-zlang@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 14:31:52 +0100 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 0/3] LTP random fixes for xfs and btrfs X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Zorro Lang via ltp From: Zorro Lang Reply-To: Zorro Lang Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: ltp-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" [PATCH 1/3] ioctl_ficlone02.c: set all_filesystems to zero It doesn't skip filesystems as its plan, fix it. [PATCH 2/3] stat04+lstat03: fix bad blocksize mkfs option for xfs mkfs.xfs doesn't support "-b 1024", needs "-b size=1024" [PATCH 3/3] stat04+lstat03: skip test on btrfs The "-b" option of mkfs.btrfs isn't a blocksize option, there's not blocksize option in mkfs.btrfs. So I'd like to skip this test for btrfs. But I'm not sure if there's better way, so CC *btrfs list* to get more review points for that. (BTW, better to have a common helper to deal with different filesystems' blocksize options in the future)