From patchwork Tue Oct 5 20:25:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1536921 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8MC6PTxz9sPB for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:29:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HP8MC4rbtz3cDh for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:29:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=h4dMKaJ5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HP8Hz0RF8z2yWn for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 07:26:38 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195JkxkJ010155; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=i8WU+uecmS0bbQeBI3aOaT0Qz99UfNKVh77eTGD9RKQ=; b=h4dMKaJ5t86D44iRnIvyfJepwlXgwePtvWod6U+L7s2HxkXS8ywt4r+oDcDagn3D6sEg bbOruos6OeJWo76DAjRVWfdDqLuDJlVVDQcyvHD/yCiAJdVsinyRsIrsa3DUl0ff8C8D g0al1lTGv3IHwHyyMS5OUEGNlr6r79mWJv2mN4BQpq0e1VyZSbd1GSaRvkVAGnIbKJvk YX0pm71J6r8CB1Q5+1CEsFUSpOi9OPI4c9QQcAAdscomZiYfmqXK2INSWqREuOy1fAsg Xd2gc4DVNPxmPSPPs7pns+fbKbCvqfvAoxiB/ZcodU+Mhm9Z+zlTv2GxHMiDAIU66ad9 cQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtw04e36-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:16 -0400 Received: from m0098396.ppops.net (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 195KOa8V004602; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:26:15 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3bgtw04e2h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 16:26:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 195KIgKW012963; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3bef2ax1nu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:26:13 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 195KQAAQ62521632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:10 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0CCAE055; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B3AE051; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from naverao1-tp.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.5.112]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 20:26:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Jordan Niethe , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Christophe Leroy , Johan Almbladh , Song Liu Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/bpf: Fix BPF_SUB when imm == 0x80000000 Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 01:55:23 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: i-xqZF7ryL11R_mdTfTdm5PfHNJTXdn_ X-Proofpoint-GUID: aDYNopLgYvgf1PJ0Lmn-7171BTKYYsKf X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.182.1,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.391,FMLib:17.0.607.475 definitions=2021-10-05_04,2021-10-04_01,2020-04-07_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2109230001 definitions=main-2110050117 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" We aren't handling subtraction involving an immediate value of 0x80000000 properly. Fix the same. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy --- Changelog: - Split up BPF_ADD and BPF_SUB cases per Christophe's comments arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index d67f6d62e2e1ff..6626e6c17d4ed2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -330,18 +330,25 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, src_reg)); goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst += (u32) imm */ - case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst -= (u32) imm */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ADD | BPF_K: /* dst += imm */ + if (!imm) { + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + } else if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); + } else { + PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); + } + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + case BPF_ALU | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* (u32) dst -= (u32) imm */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_SUB | BPF_K: /* dst -= imm */ - if (BPF_OP(code) == BPF_SUB) - imm = -imm; - if (imm) { - if (imm >= -32768 && imm < 32768) - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(imm))); - else { - PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); - EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADD(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); - } + if (!imm) { + goto bpf_alu32_trunc; + } else if (imm > -32768 && imm < 32768) { + EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(dst_reg, dst_reg, IMM_L(-imm))); + } else { + PPC_LI32(b2p[TMP_REG_1], imm); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_SUB(dst_reg, dst_reg, b2p[TMP_REG_1])); } goto bpf_alu32_trunc; case BPF_ALU | BPF_MUL | BPF_X: /* (u32) dst *= (u32) src */