From patchwork Wed Sep 12 01:23:22 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sam Bobroff X-Patchwork-Id: 968795 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4294FH5kfPz9s2P for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:38:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4294FH4MynzF3Hw for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:38:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4293vh43gbzF3FK for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:23:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8C1MKxd043281 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:23:42 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2men9dfgec-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:23:41 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 02:23:39 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 12 Sep 2018 02:23:37 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w8C1NajA60096536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 01:23:36 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E9AA4053 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 04:23:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A7DA404D for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 04:23:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 04:23:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from tungsten.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A93EDA027B for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:23:32 +1000 (AEST) From: Sam Bobroff To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 03/14] powerpc/eeh: Fix use of EEH_PE_KEEP on wrong field Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:23:22 +1000 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.0.2.gcad72f5712 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18091201-0012-0000-0000-000002A76C86 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18091201-0013-0000-0000-000020DBAB1E Message-Id: <5f6d6706080162736de076afec8fc0ad8cc8dcac.1536715396.git.sbobroff@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-09-11_14:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=539 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809120012 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" eeh_add_to_parent_pe() sometimes removes the EEH_PE_KEEP flag, but it incorrectly removes it from pe->type, instead of pe->state. However, rather than clearing it from the correct field, remove it. Inspection of the code shows that it can't ever have had any effect (even if it had been cleared from the correct field), because the field is never tested after it is cleared by the statement in question. The clear statement was added by commit 807a827d4e74 ("powerpc/eeh: Keep PE during hotplug"), but it didn't explain why it was necessary. Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff --- arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c index 1b238ecc553e..210d239a9395 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ int eeh_add_to_parent_pe(struct eeh_dev *edev) while (parent) { if (!(parent->type & EEH_PE_INVALID)) break; - parent->type &= ~(EEH_PE_INVALID | EEH_PE_KEEP); + parent->type &= ~EEH_PE_INVALID; parent = parent->parent; }