From patchwork Tue Mar 31 09:58:24 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sandipan Das X-Patchwork-Id: 1264659 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48s5b23kRCz9sQt for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:45:50 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48s5b22XM0zDqwH for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:45:50 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sandipan@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48s4Yy36FSzDqSl for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:59:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02V9ZjK2134812 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 05:59:47 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 303uj3419h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 05:59:47 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:59:35 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:59:30 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 02V9xdiL11337738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:59:39 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176A54C044; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:59:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777834C046; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:59:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fir03.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.121.59.65]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:59:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Sandipan Das To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: [PATCH v19 23/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use the correct page size on powerpc Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:28:24 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20033109-0008-0000-0000-00000367B4F4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20033109-0009-0000-0000-00004A893910 Message-Id: <5dcdfbf3353acdc90f315172e800b49f5ca21299.1585646528.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_03:2020-03-30, 2020-03-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003310081 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, msuchanek@suse.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Both 4K and 64K pages are supported on powerpc. Parts of the selftest code perform alignment computations based on the PAGE_SIZE macro which is currently hardcoded to 64K for powerpc. This causes some test failures on kernels configured with 4K page size. In some cases, we need to enforce function alignment on page size. Since this can only be done at build time, 64K is used as the alignment factor as that also ensures 4K alignment. Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das Acked-by: Dave Hansen --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h index 02bd4dd7d467a..3a761e51a5878 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-powerpc.h @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ pkey-31 and exec-only key */ #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY 2 #define HPAGE_SIZE (1UL << 24) -#define PAGE_SIZE (1UL << 16) +#define PAGE_SIZE sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) static inline u32 pkey_bit_position(int pkey) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c index a1cb9a71e77ce..fc19addcb5c82 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c @@ -146,7 +146,12 @@ void abort_hooks(void) * will then fault, which makes sure that the fault code handles * execute-only memory properly. */ +#ifdef __powerpc64__ +/* This way, both 4K and 64K alignment are maintained */ +__attribute__((__aligned__(65536))) +#else __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE))) +#endif void lots_o_noops_around_write(int *write_to_me) { dprintf3("running %s()\n", __func__);