From patchwork Mon Feb 14 10:41:37 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Naveen N. Rao" X-Patchwork-Id: 1592430 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy1Fy2Pdnz9s8s for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jy1Fx5fYLz3dxX for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:50:13 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=LDMLj5VS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jy15c0Clxz3cRP for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 21:42:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21E9LCft003556; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=0YUswnmmsPdrnIUuNRNtpZu2+MBxfUX1qSGmicM6LvE=; b=LDMLj5VSyevVlnO6ul3GLvzHE96mYQegN0OK4Hfm4+x7tZdANDo9snewvAsakzPHPb6P PjB5bXac4q3/2KDWATFZbkR0cUOiMNMq159ARQCGLS/rcgaaq2kbL4aOeIFo7jYNB48A kfHCiyo+UMDiv/4w3z45fuMYk25DH4cKCp4zHODt6IQQZ60o9mWz9shQAuip++JU4rad 8rvxauAlmh/2wWgMUhdh69pLGcU35LyGv1bo9AmFMfeenOxk9ZPMT5bBk3jRLy/+sdkM 5fiq7wuVtpBQLXxu65+ws2ocLXlqQOuZF5aoR3/h5F67ZOaGPFZVp5jnC+ySO+k9iQIj eA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7ath407n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 21EA0iTV012824; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3e7ath406w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 21EAXt0h005444; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3e64h937ky-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:17 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 21EAgEoc44368164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E36AE061; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C419EAE045; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-NotSettable.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.124.167]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:42:11 +0000 (GMT) From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: Michael Ellerman Subject: [PATCH powerpc/next 03/17] powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXIT Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:11:37 +0530 Message-Id: <33aa2e92645a92712be23b18035a2c6dcb92ff8d.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: DktMQKaM_gIxIasgzYa-ByYSL8ffYfHr X-Proofpoint-GUID: WLY8b783cQYNBouAcTswsVr-pjtwC3hA X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2022-02-14_02,2022-02-14_03,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=813 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2201110000 definitions=main-2202140064 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Yauheni Kaliuta , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Hari Bathini Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" In some scenarios, it is possible that the program epilogue is outside the branch range for a BPF_EXIT instruction. Instead of rejecting such programs, emit epilogue as an alternate exit point from the program. Track the location of the same so that subsequent exits can take either of the two paths. Reported-by: Jordan Niethe Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 7 +++++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++++-- 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 9cdd33d6be4cc0..3b5c44c0b6638d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct codegen_context { unsigned int stack_size; int b2p[ARRAY_SIZE(b2p)]; unsigned int exentry_idx; + unsigned int alt_exit_addr; }; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx); +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr); int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 56dd1f4e3e4447..141e64585b6458 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -89,6 +89,22 @@ static int bpf_jit_fixup_addresses(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, return 0; } +int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr) +{ + if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) { + PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + } else if (ctx->alt_exit_addr) { + if (WARN_ON(!is_offset_in_branch_range((long)ctx->alt_exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4)))) + return -1; + PPC_JMP(ctx->alt_exit_addr); + } else { + ctx->alt_exit_addr = ctx->idx * 4; + bpf_jit_build_epilogue(image, ctx); + } + + return 0; +} + struct powerpc64_jit_data { struct bpf_binary_header *header; u32 *addrs; @@ -177,8 +193,10 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) * If we have seen a tail call, we need a second pass. * This is because bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue() is called * from bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() with a not yet stable ctx->seen. + * We also need a second pass if we ended up with too large + * a program so as to ensure BPF_EXIT branches are in range. */ - if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL) { + if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL || !is_offset_in_branch_range((long)cgctx.idx * 4)) { cgctx.idx = 0; if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0)) { fp = org_fp; @@ -193,6 +211,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) * calculate total size from idx. */ bpf_jit_build_prologue(0, &cgctx); + addrs[fp->len] = cgctx.idx * 4; bpf_jit_build_epilogue(0, &cgctx); fixup_len = fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4; @@ -233,6 +252,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) for (pass = 1; pass < 3; pass++) { /* Now build the prologue, body code & epilogue for real. */ cgctx.idx = 0; + cgctx.alt_exit_addr = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass)) { bpf_jit_binary_free(bpf_hdr); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 81e0c56661ddf2..f401bfc5a67684 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -929,8 +929,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * the epilogue. If we _are_ the last instruction, * we'll just fall through to the epilogue. */ - if (i != flen - 1) - PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + if (i != flen - 1) { + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, _R0, exit_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; + } /* else fall through to the epilogue */ break; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index b1ed8611091d2b..371bd5a16859c7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -871,8 +871,11 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * * the epilogue. If we _are_ the last instruction, * we'll just fall through to the epilogue. */ - if (i != flen - 1) - PPC_JMP(exit_addr); + if (i != flen - 1) { + ret = bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(image, ctx, b2p[TMP_REG_1], exit_addr); + if (ret) + return ret; + } /* else fall through to the epilogue */ break;