From patchwork Sun Jul 7 14:44:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Athira Rajeev X-Patchwork-Id: 1957708 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VNv5BJTI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WH9CQ47vpz1xr9 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:50:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VNv5BJTI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WH9CQ352Yz3cQD for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:50:10 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=VNv5BJTI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WH95W0sqgz3cLL for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:45:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 467BP27S024196; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=lcUCjwktAhFIA 1O56PipgJnZSgAksv+CoiSR2v7NN4w=; b=VNv5BJTIwUZRanf3833IX1yJqSugZ y3PAS42JO2Oz30x2OKeYpbytLCuthlgOZ0z44fz8uqmRnbfnYvDnvD+N4Da8L9jm Qp3y/9i0aDRFLglbPBmwtF7vRczR330uYnK+9phkaF8LD74KSg7Gvr5D/Z13EH3A Hs5R7/Z3hQeaaKUMsP6loNr56qn7K3dxG88GSoFN3yXgvw7QlL5HHB1uaw/N5A4Q dCZN1YhRGakoWsCuJd4cYRqEw8FxMVX1/JXkYQyYtPrQsGdQC37/YPqnirFGNEfG qMqUjN7hDMTmTOadasddZO1Dhl8lCMQZu0wS25zYMGv1KSp37zYlac0eg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 407sqwratm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 14:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 467EisSV007225; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:55 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 407sqwrath-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 14:44:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 467B6x1q024598; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:53 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 407hrmad7q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 14:44:53 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 467Eilqj52101458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:49 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48FF20049; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E3020040; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.43.1.68]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:44:44 +0000 (GMT) From: Athira Rajeev To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, irogers@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, segher@kernel.crashing.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu Subject: [PATCH V6 07/18] tools/perf: Add parse function for memory instructions in powerpc Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 20:14:08 +0530 Message-Id: <20240707144419.92510-8-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20240707144419.92510-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20240707144419.92510-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: BW3CcIAs1TuJHp9eWxf0xHC1vY_KTbt0 X-Proofpoint-GUID: y1ADKHXEPR164rlZJf8BbRlAMKOUB6Dj X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-07-07_06,2024-07-05_01,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2406140001 definitions=main-2407070113 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akanksha@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Use the raw instruction code and macros to identify memory instructions, extract register fields and also offset. The implementation addresses the D-form, X-form, DS-form instructions. Two main functions are added. New parse function "load_store__parse" as instruction ops parser for memory instructions. Unlink other parser (like mov__parse), this parser fills in the "multi_regs" field for source/target and new added "mem_ref" field. No other fields are set because, here there is no need to parse the disassembled code and arch specific macros will take care of extracting offset and regs which is easier and will be precise. In powerpc, all instructions with a primary opcode from 32 to 63 are memory instructions. Update "ins__find" function to have "raw_insn" also as a parameter. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- .../perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c | 16 ++++++ tools/perf/util/disasm.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++-- tools/perf/util/disasm.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c index d57fd023ef9c..b084423d8477 100644 --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/annotate/instructions.c @@ -49,6 +49,22 @@ static struct ins_ops *powerpc__associate_instruction_ops(struct arch *arch, con return ops; } +#define PPC_OP(op) (((op) >> 26) & 0x3F) + +static struct ins_ops *check_ppc_insn(u32 raw_insn) +{ + int opcode = PPC_OP(raw_insn); + + /* + * Instructions with opcode 32 to 63 are memory + * instructions in powerpc + */ + if ((opcode & 0x20)) + return &load_store_ops; + + return NULL; +} + static int powerpc__annotate_init(struct arch *arch, char *cpuid __maybe_unused) { if (!arch->initialized) { diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c index 8e45f0874e03..b30277a930c0 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct ins_ops mov_ops; static struct ins_ops nop_ops; static struct ins_ops lock_ops; static struct ins_ops ret_ops; +static struct ins_ops load_store_ops; static int jump__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size, struct ins_operands *ops, int max_ins_name); @@ -522,7 +523,7 @@ static int lock__parse(struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map_s if (disasm_line__parse(ops->raw, &ops->locked.ins.name, &ops->locked.ops->raw) < 0) goto out_free_ops; - ops->locked.ins.ops = ins__find(arch, ops->locked.ins.name); + ops->locked.ins.ops = ins__find(arch, ops->locked.ins.name, 0); if (ops->locked.ins.ops == NULL) goto out_free_ops; @@ -678,6 +679,37 @@ static struct ins_ops mov_ops = { .scnprintf = mov__scnprintf, }; +static int load_store__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size, + struct ins_operands *ops, int max_ins_name) +{ + return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-*s %s", max_ins_name, ins->name, + ops->raw); +} + +/* + * Sets the fields: multi_regs and "mem_ref". + * "mem_ref" is set for ops->source which is later used to + * fill the objdump->memory_ref-char field. This ops is currently + * used by powerpc and since binary instruction code is used to + * extract opcode, regs and offset, no other parsing is needed here + */ +static int load_store__parse(struct arch *arch __maybe_unused, struct ins_operands *ops, + struct map_symbol *ms __maybe_unused, struct disasm_line *dl __maybe_unused) +{ + ops->source.mem_ref = true; + ops->source.multi_regs = false; + + ops->target.mem_ref = false; + ops->target.multi_regs = false; + + return 0; +} + +static struct ins_ops load_store_ops = { + .parse = load_store__parse, + .scnprintf = load_store__scnprintf, +}; + static int dec__parse(struct arch *arch __maybe_unused, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map_symbol *ms __maybe_unused, struct disasm_line *dl __maybe_unused) { @@ -769,11 +801,23 @@ static void ins__sort(struct arch *arch) qsort(arch->instructions, nmemb, sizeof(struct ins), ins__cmp); } -static struct ins_ops *__ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name) +static struct ins_ops *__ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name, u32 raw_insn) { struct ins *ins; const int nmemb = arch->nr_instructions; + if (arch__is(arch, "powerpc")) { + /* + * For powerpc, identify the instruction ops + * from the opcode using raw_insn. + */ + struct ins_ops *ops; + + ops = check_ppc_insn(raw_insn); + if (ops) + return ops; + } + if (!arch->sorted_instructions) { ins__sort(arch); arch->sorted_instructions = true; @@ -803,9 +847,9 @@ static struct ins_ops *__ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name) return ins ? ins->ops : NULL; } -struct ins_ops *ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name) +struct ins_ops *ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name, u32 raw_insn) { - struct ins_ops *ops = __ins__find(arch, name); + struct ins_ops *ops = __ins__find(arch, name, raw_insn); if (!ops && arch->associate_instruction_ops) ops = arch->associate_instruction_ops(arch, name); @@ -815,7 +859,7 @@ struct ins_ops *ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name) static void disasm_line__init_ins(struct disasm_line *dl, struct arch *arch, struct map_symbol *ms) { - dl->ins.ops = ins__find(arch, dl->ins.name); + dl->ins.ops = ins__find(arch, dl->ins.name, dl->raw.raw_insn); if (!dl->ins.ops) return; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h index 30be0a94ea04..c1bb1e484bfb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.h @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct annotate_args { struct arch *arch__find(const char *name); bool arch__is(struct arch *arch, const char *name); -struct ins_ops *ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name); +struct ins_ops *ins__find(struct arch *arch, const char *name, u32 raw_insn); int ins__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size, struct ins_operands *ops, int max_ins_name);