From patchwork Fri Jun 21 14:25:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 1950816 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=A4XGJQWf; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NF2N8H2o; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W5KSj1ZHZz20Wb for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:27:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=A4XGJQWf; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NF2N8H2o; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W5KSh0Lg9z3cZn for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:27:32 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=A4XGJQWf; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NF2N8H2o; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=170.10.129.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W5KQ61Czwz3cX6 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:25:17 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718979915; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VpPwnVRxGccST937wjacfAT3ndiJzOREHKlh4Jm8zSE=; b=A4XGJQWf1W3bYUzhFwiq5AApcOb+kPKpusr4oguxDixyLpSw2lfhCJYz26/lsriMvP5aYK GcG7WNAqaaeDdTGmswkUaRJ3ZGpJ8DiQ2NPGpaQdKZYHKQgw9Ngnz1xTORWtRVfuS2Y0l0 ZA/nSt6B4+eyKYgSuQorh9/hedpqX+4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718979916; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VpPwnVRxGccST937wjacfAT3ndiJzOREHKlh4Jm8zSE=; b=NF2N8H2oqByIeDgDzmm+nlaxVT0Nutvj2HJFc344JXM/OH4SMfONt62KwkktzzJ0tTD49S 5vGMIgBM5tRDwh9a+t9X+J8gc80j1ClSXXvb5qACeP1JVV/XiL4TM2TepmRwlQu16Sv+n4 8IBbjinhsyk5xuhfiqwSQJUAUVlnExw= Received: from mail-ot1-f70.google.com (mail-ot1-f70.google.com [209.85.210.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-247--CGAS_twOXOIP6qjKazayA-1; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:25:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -CGAS_twOXOIP6qjKazayA-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6faa28bab62so471227a34.3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:25:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718979913; x=1719584713; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VpPwnVRxGccST937wjacfAT3ndiJzOREHKlh4Jm8zSE=; b=lV3GahsT1535ScrryD+mqVJefgCVuURHbF92xTo6eMn1kvYQr93PO+gmTwk+KeaSfc Jm79vtLgkpLCckwQlftTBBXGetD+rsOGe5Dpkm+p0hUqxg47CX5M9B2bSmqjFRtjBKm+ zze0mC4jtMouyEsGdJ9rWxkrp7EEvZjzFc6jeKBb+IDKqOBNmhiZxPrhp7VGk6iDymKu bZ/oMSEVB50SE2FJV80vBSSuAGp6uFV4CzGifyk3uDUHLb80z7fzBkg+P+Toe3+K5UTn Y7XEWpkeZs4/uyp8Yha1hTYt+KLowaYJjuZteB+hECQSIyYgXm7TIDLe/iluxS2URYtj RpVw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVpGE5pgMytrd9cwxkpalN+RxZejjCu1E0NrfjzyJqmtqdopn5ShBJdL374JPBGMyRS64vln3I8f1gUemOJ554NOwaz+DPE4YxndpgZCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQmXCdtk4NEe920ylb8zXqXRl7FvVT2MogXNSf99NbKkW+vuWn GYGXFnB4XR0lFHFj2tZ6UpF0IbCnLR2UHbWVRiik2KEsSC9sXI1Z1tRCkIiIpOEDT9PF/+Grg2f SYl5rKtqvg2rePn+/vkmBmDp+ej2vp1y3p96Ppr1c8c71AMAnAgoPoru8kPjxgDU= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c60f:0:b0:5bd:af39:c9d9 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c1ad9093ebmr9601664eaf.0.1718979913414; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:25:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFna6HwoEVcDVzacrmJp70i2Ye9mZl03svl3PALStAHNV8VRqUBmNMnAivUzvRTiL6Q97gHJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c60f:0:b0:5bd:af39:c9d9 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c1ad9093ebmr9601627eaf.0.1718979912731; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x1n.redhat.com (pool-99-254-121-117.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com. [99.254.121.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-79bce944cb2sm90564785a.125.2024.06.21.07.25.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:25:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Xu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH 3/7] mm/mprotect: Push mmu notifier to PUDs Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:25:00 -0400 Message-ID: <20240621142504.1940209-4-peterx@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.0 In-Reply-To: <20240621142504.1940209-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20240621142504.1940209-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , peterx@redhat.com, Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , David Rientjes , Dave Jiang , x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Matthew Wilcox , Ingo Molnar , Huang Ying , Rik van Riel , Sean Christopherson , Nicholas Piggin , Borislav Petkov , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Oscar Salvador , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Paolo Bonzini , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" mprotect() does mmu notifiers in PMD levels. It's there since 2014 of commit a5338093bfb4 ("mm: move mmu notifier call from change_protection to change_pmd_range"). At that time, the issue was that NUMA balancing can be applied on a huge range of VM memory, even if nothing was populated. The notification can be avoided in this case if no valid pmd detected, which includes either THP or a PTE pgtable page. Now to pave way for PUD handling, this isn't enough. We need to generate mmu notifications even on PUD entries properly. mprotect() is currently broken on PUD (e.g., one can easily trigger kernel error with dax 1G mappings already), this is the start to fix it. To fix that, this patch proposes to push such notifications to the PUD layers. There is risk on regressing the problem Rik wanted to resolve before, but I think it shouldn't really happen, and I still chose this solution because of a few reasons: 1) Consider a large VM that should definitely contain more than GBs of memory, it's highly likely that PUDs are also none. In this case there will have no regression. 2) KVM has evolved a lot over the years to get rid of rmap walks, which might be the major cause of the previous soft-lockup. At least TDP MMU already got rid of rmap as long as not nested (which should be the major use case, IIUC), then the TDP MMU pgtable walker will simply see empty VM pgtable (e.g. EPT on x86), the invalidation of a full empty region in most cases could be pretty fast now, comparing to 2014. 3) KVM has explicit code paths now to even give way for mmu notifiers just like this one, e.g. in commit d02c357e5bfa ("KVM: x86/mmu: Retry fault before acquiring mmu_lock if mapping is changing"). It'll also avoid contentions that may also contribute to a soft-lockup. 4) Stick with PMD layer simply don't work when PUD is there... We need one way or another to fix PUD mappings on mprotect(). Pushing it to PUD should be the safest approach as of now, e.g. there's yet no sign of huge P4D coming on any known archs. Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Peter Xu --- mm/mprotect.c | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c index 21172272695e..fb8bf3ff7cd9 100644 --- a/mm/mprotect.c +++ b/mm/mprotect.c @@ -363,9 +363,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pmd_t *pmd; unsigned long next; long pages = 0; - struct mmu_notifier_range range; - - range.start = 0; pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); do { @@ -383,14 +380,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, if (pmd_none(*pmd)) goto next; - /* invoke the mmu notifier if the pmd is populated */ - if (!range.start) { - mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, - MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0, - vma->vm_mm, addr, end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); - } - _pmd = pmdp_get_lockless(pmd); if (is_swap_pmd(_pmd) || pmd_trans_huge(_pmd) || pmd_devmap(_pmd)) { if ((next - addr != HPAGE_PMD_SIZE) || @@ -428,9 +417,6 @@ static inline long change_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, cond_resched(); } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end); - if (range.start) - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); - return pages; } @@ -438,10 +424,13 @@ static inline long change_pud_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma, p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot, unsigned long cp_flags) { + struct mmu_notifier_range range; pud_t *pud; unsigned long next; long pages = 0, ret; + range.start = 0; + pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr); do { next = pud_addr_end(addr, end); @@ -450,10 +439,19 @@ static inline long change_pud_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, return ret; if (pud_none_or_clear_bad(pud)) continue; + if (!range.start) { + mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, + MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0, + vma->vm_mm, addr, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range); + } pages += change_pmd_range(tlb, vma, pud, addr, next, newprot, cp_flags); } while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end); + if (range.start) + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); + return pages; }