From patchwork Tue Apr 2 10:58:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1918739 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qQ/QZzXd; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V84dh2Tjpz1yYw for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:59:36 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qQ/QZzXd; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V84dh1RbBz3dXL for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:59:36 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qQ/QZzXd; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V84cb4pm9z3d36 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 21:58:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 432AM04L008981; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=1ww2COLBTJ7bgaqnVHBGXC4jLJucs8Cb646lLA0cG04=; b=qQ/QZzXddIXh983H3uImULbsCLmIgChfDaoNO8dVbcBOiqsDI4TC7nrxFwdxKzbpQVsK t3peLKBDNP2o9foNzRzQ5+gR9CppF3KUVA0/6fdqTMAjOMuJUNJeVVRBuQZ2iXP11tPQ 2S0yfDKVPYOMqo2sDU1VZfVaH+wTjdm0lCRT5Roo9xHXvQW8P/APS6sDXP3aj1YiERgQ GyKaD3Rb403KSsw2f2Q9PDS1WJH0xeHFfWzMSu7HsDibfQX8N0fNzStNxAL07JU4KGkC f75fChqGSgZs0R8rE3NVlMqFs2A6Hkw+bg9y6A1nSFQV1vUcsOw0M3P0YVPFZzSNeJQ/ ng== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x8eyagbgp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:58:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 4329B4JQ015207; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:13 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x6y9kwmqc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:58:13 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 432Aw9oH47186180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:11 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E1F20043; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E0520040; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.203.115.195]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:58:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc64/bpf: fix tail calls for PCREL addressing Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 16:28:05 +0530 Message-ID: <20240402105806.352037-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: V-_q5Nr3V6K8HGWUHWkNp2QfkgIABNiX X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: V-_q5Nr3V6K8HGWUHWkNp2QfkgIABNiX X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-04-02_04,2024-04-01_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2403210000 definitions=main-2404020079 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" , Martin KaFai Lau Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" With PCREL addressing, there is no kernel TOC. So, it is not setup in prologue when PCREL addressing is used. But the number of instructions to skip on a tail call was not adjusted accordingly. That resulted in not so obvious failures while using tailcalls. 'tailcalls' selftest crashed the system with the below call trace: bpf_test_run+0xe8/0x3cc (unreliable) bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x348/0x778 __sys_bpf+0xb04/0x2b00 sys_bpf+0x28/0x38 system_call_exception+0x168/0x340 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec Fixes: 7e3a68be42e1 ("powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- * Changes in v3: - New patch to fix tailcall issues with PCREL addressing. arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 79f23974a320..7f62ac4b4e65 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -285,8 +285,10 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o int b2p_index = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_3); int bpf_tailcall_prologue_size = 8; +#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PCREL if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2)) bpf_tailcall_prologue_size += 4; /* skip past the toc load */ +#endif /* * if (index >= array->map.max_entries)