From patchwork Tue Apr 2 07:51:42 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kefeng Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1918685 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V81105V91z1yYw for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:16:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V81103NZhz3dTv for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:16:04 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.190; helo=szxga04-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V810p1wXlz2xWS for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:15:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.88.214]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V80Rc70dCz29kHr; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:50:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.93]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B81221A016C; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:53:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.112.125) by dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:53:20 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: Subject: [PATCH 7/7] x86: mm: accelerate pagefault when badaccess Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:51:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20240402075142.196265-8-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20240402075142.196265-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> References: <20240402075142.196265-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.112.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Kefeng Wang , Paul Walmsley , Russell King , surenb@google.com, Dave Hansen , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Nicholas Piggin , Andy Lutomirski , Alexander Gordeev , Will Deacon , Gerald Schaefer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The vm_flags of vma already checked under per-VMA lock, if it is a bad access, directly handle error and return, there is no need to lock_mm_and_find_vma() and check vm_flags again. Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan --- arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index a4cc20d0036d..67b18adc75dd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -866,14 +866,17 @@ bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, static void __bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, - unsigned long address, u32 pkey, int si_code) + unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm, + struct vm_area_struct *vma, u32 pkey, int si_code) { - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; /* * Something tried to access memory that isn't in our memory map.. * Fix it, but check if it's kernel or user first.. */ - mmap_read_unlock(mm); + if (mm) + mmap_read_unlock(mm); + else + vma_end_read(vma); __bad_area_nosemaphore(regs, error_code, address, pkey, si_code); } @@ -897,7 +900,8 @@ static inline bool bad_area_access_from_pkeys(unsigned long error_code, static noinline void bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, - unsigned long address, struct vm_area_struct *vma) + unsigned long address, struct mm_struct *mm, + struct vm_area_struct *vma) { /* * This OSPKE check is not strictly necessary at runtime. @@ -927,9 +931,9 @@ bad_area_access_error(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, */ u32 pkey = vma_pkey(vma); - __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR); + __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, pkey, SEGV_PKUERR); } else { - __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, 0, SEGV_ACCERR); + __bad_area(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma, 0, SEGV_ACCERR); } } @@ -1357,8 +1361,9 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, goto lock_mmap; if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) { - vma_end_read(vma); - goto lock_mmap; + bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, NULL, vma); + count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_SUCCESS); + return; } fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags | FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK, regs); if (!(fault & (VM_FAULT_RETRY | VM_FAULT_COMPLETED))) @@ -1394,7 +1399,7 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, * we can handle it.. */ if (unlikely(access_error(error_code, vma))) { - bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, vma); + bad_area_access_error(regs, error_code, address, mm, vma); return; }