From patchwork Mon Mar 25 05:52:58 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Benjamin Gray X-Patchwork-Id: 1915413 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=XM88DUSY; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V32Hf6LGJz1yWy for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56:30 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=XM88DUSY; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V32Hf3qzxz3vZJ for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:56:30 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=XM88DUSY; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bgray@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4V32DC3lZzz3bmy for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:53:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353727.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42P5fCE0011696; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:21 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ESa+NiLlTpzFYmhgHFktXJTFzSXeDdFhRjs59W3vEVM=; b=XM88DUSYZjVBcTD+cfMnPZdUC/+Qc6iOjrozsuFNSD7ochhaQaoglm+pB+L97kUn7tox 4AyqwaYFD9ernFm1LlUEXq5LJo/LsrXMhgCK/uJFGYSHhzWjyB24xGOrQVxKGttihhfZ 60f9D+sjlEQEMRZrmcp8we9VefsEqqAUvbAeULdgGpZzaKmB1hY8RG6hPm31aJdtJmY2 cz6lyPpjs7Gf36yVzzwAyixdwJaq6RHOFVTnEFvBWbsZNqhc0UnBl58M96yYcuBgo6s2 hLAu/1X7i7tbefbhkvS27D98arwejVjCuWca62PukIDCdE3s0Vy+A7JIqXDT+50c8NzV zg== Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x2hdksjk6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:21 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42P5amk9028790; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:20 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x2adny3sk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:19 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 42P5rFoS36176272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:18 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D913E20040; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110122004B; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 05:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bgray-lenovo-p15.ozlabs.ibm.com (haven.au.ibm.com [9.192.254.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEBB660429; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:53:12 +1100 (AEDT) From: Benjamin Gray To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] powerpc/code-patching: Add generic memory patching Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:52:58 +1100 Message-ID: <20240325055302.876434-2-bgray@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0 In-Reply-To: <20240325055302.876434-1-bgray@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240325055302.876434-1-bgray@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: xSbasb8WOa4Z7wSt6ZC8A3-9aml3vO8c X-Proofpoint-GUID: xSbasb8WOa4Z7wSt6ZC8A3-9aml3vO8c X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-25_03,2024-03-21_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2403210000 definitions=main-2403250030 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Naveen N Rao , Benjamin Gray Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" patch_instruction() is designed for patching instructions in otherwise readonly memory. Other consumers also sometimes need to patch readonly memory, so have abused patch_instruction() for arbitrary data patches. This is a problem on ppc64 as patch_instruction() decides on the patch width using the 'instruction' opcode to see if it's a prefixed instruction. Data that triggers this can lead to larger writes, possibly crossing a page boundary and failing the write altogether. Introduce patch_uint(), and patch_ulong(), with aliases patch_u32(), and patch_u64() (on ppc64) designed for aligned data patches. The patch size is now determined by the called function, and is passed as an additional parameter to generic internals. While the instruction flushing is not required for data patches, it remains unconditional in this patch. A followup series is possible if benchmarking shows fewer flushes gives an improvement in some data-patching workload. ppc32 does not support prefixed instructions, so is unaffected by the original issue. Care is taken in not exposing the size parameter in the public (non-static) interface, so the compiler can const-propagate it away. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray --- v3: * Rename from *_memory to *_mem * Change type of ppc32 patch_uint() address to void* * Explain introduction of val32 for big endian * Some formatting v2: * Deduplicate patch_32() definition * Use u32 for val32 * Remove noinline --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 31 ++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h index 0e29ccf903d0..21a36e2c4e26 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h @@ -76,6 +76,37 @@ int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); int patch_instructions(u32 *addr, u32 *code, size_t len, bool repeat_instr); +/* + * The data patching functions patch_uint() and patch_ulong(), etc., must be + * called on aligned addresses. + * + * The instruction patching functions patch_instruction() and similar must be + * called on addresses satisfying instruction alignment requirements. + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 + +int patch_uint(void *addr, unsigned int val); +int patch_ulong(void *addr, unsigned long val); + +#define patch_u64 patch_ulong + +#else + +static inline int patch_uint(void *addr, unsigned int val) +{ + return patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(val)); +} + +static inline int patch_ulong(void *addr, unsigned long val) +{ + return patch_instruction(addr, ppc_inst(val)); +} + +#endif + +#define patch_u32 patch_uint + static inline unsigned long patch_site_addr(s32 *site) { return (unsigned long)site + *site; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index c6ab46156cda..a31e313c6321 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -20,15 +20,14 @@ #include #include -static int __patch_instruction(u32 *exec_addr, ppc_inst_t instr, u32 *patch_addr) +static int __patch_mem(void *exec_addr, unsigned long val, void *patch_addr, bool is_dword) { - if (!ppc_inst_prefixed(instr)) { - u32 val = ppc_inst_val(instr); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) || likely(!is_dword)) { + /* For big endian correctness: plain address would use the wrong half */ + u32 val32 = val; - __put_kernel_nofault(patch_addr, &val, u32, failed); + __put_kernel_nofault(patch_addr, &val32, u32, failed); } else { - u64 val = ppc_inst_as_ulong(instr); - __put_kernel_nofault(patch_addr, &val, u64, failed); } @@ -44,7 +43,10 @@ static int __patch_instruction(u32 *exec_addr, ppc_inst_t instr, u32 *patch_addr int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) { - return __patch_instruction(addr, instr, addr); + if (ppc_inst_prefixed(instr)) + return __patch_mem(addr, ppc_inst_as_ulong(instr), addr, true); + else + return __patch_mem(addr, ppc_inst_val(instr), addr, false); } struct patch_context { @@ -276,7 +278,7 @@ static void unmap_patch_area(unsigned long addr) flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE); } -static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +static int __do_patch_mem_mm(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword) { int err; u32 *patch_addr; @@ -305,7 +307,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) orig_mm = start_using_temp_mm(patching_mm); - err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + err = __patch_mem(addr, val, patch_addr, is_dword); /* context synchronisation performed by __patch_instruction (isync or exception) */ stop_using_temp_mm(patching_mm, orig_mm); @@ -322,7 +324,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) return err; } -static int __do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +static int __do_patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword) { int err; u32 *patch_addr; @@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) if (radix_enabled()) asm volatile("ptesync": : :"memory"); - err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + err = __patch_mem(addr, val, patch_addr, is_dword); pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte); flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE); @@ -347,7 +349,7 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) return err; } -int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +static int patch_mem(void *addr, unsigned long val, bool is_dword) { int err; unsigned long flags; @@ -359,19 +361,51 @@ int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) */ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX) || !static_branch_likely(&poking_init_done)) - return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr); + return __patch_mem(addr, val, addr, is_dword); local_irq_save(flags); if (mm_patch_enabled()) - err = __do_patch_instruction_mm(addr, instr); + err = __do_patch_mem_mm(addr, val, is_dword); else - err = __do_patch_instruction(addr, instr); + err = __do_patch_mem(addr, val, is_dword); local_irq_restore(flags); return err; } + +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 + +int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +{ + if (ppc_inst_prefixed(instr)) + return patch_mem(addr, ppc_inst_as_ulong(instr), true); + else + return patch_mem(addr, ppc_inst_val(instr), false); +} NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction); +int patch_uint(void *addr, unsigned int val) +{ + return patch_mem(addr, val, false); +} +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_uint); + +int patch_ulong(void *addr, unsigned long val) +{ + return patch_mem(addr, val, true); +} +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_ulong); + +#else + +int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +{ + return patch_mem(addr, ppc_inst_val(instr), false); +} +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction) + +#endif + static int __patch_instructions(u32 *patch_addr, u32 *code, size_t len, bool repeat_instr) { unsigned long start = (unsigned long)patch_addr;