From patchwork Thu Feb 29 12:25:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Michael Ellerman X-Patchwork-Id: 1906301 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=BNlK/dFR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tlr733xHPz1yX7 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:26:23 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=BNlK/dFR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tlr733CFRz3vbK for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:26:23 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=201909 header.b=BNlK/dFR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tlr614XZmz3bTt for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:25:29 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1709209529; bh=d8DMBmw30boXs+gg+sMlFV3Oee8eKnf7k8zk1T/y2xM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BNlK/dFRLZ0iPQD8F/HHOvKJNwtzkTCjFQ3wV7WQ/LfB+D8mhxVTg6mWOQ0xCugwt /YGjpb4ZrK0anxYySVXzdE6s55DfvfV/26pNYk0T+sOWM6f+5Kac2MjuEChtrRU4pC D3NA9WjKDDgAXpjNJHCRd4kFRWFPMRjNzsvKYH9fSeIe4oia18YI0WDseNbullcRJg YisGemZvvBV3wgNbROpfqJrMMH/YEXCQ9ts7rdofrzPfI92NZPQ5p+e/dcqBvg1HK6 o2YZlORRGkdlO3lPce3705h+cwovol6lI93k8Pa3TPWGfjzNrxtnENaD0HivPlm3mV R7Z82nQPqNqYw== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Tlr6138V3z4wcb; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:25:29 +1100 (AEDT) From: Michael Ellerman To: Subject: [PATCH 3/5] powerpc/fsl: Fix mfpmr build errors with newer binutils Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 23:25:19 +1100 Message-ID: <20240229122521.762431-3-mpe@ellerman.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.2 In-Reply-To: <20240229122521.762431-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> References: <20240229122521.762431-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Binutils 2.38 complains about the use of mfpmr when building ppc6xx_defconfig: CC arch/powerpc/kernel/pmc.o {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:45: Error: unrecognized opcode: `mfpmr' {standard input}:56: Error: unrecognized opcode: `mtpmr' This is because by default the kernel is built with -mcpu=powerpc, and the mt/mfpmr instructions are not defined. It can be avoided by enabling CONFIG_E300C3_CPU, but just adding that to the defconfig will leave open the possibility of randconfig failures. So add machine directives around the mt/mfpmr instructions to tell binutils how to assemble them. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Jan-Benedict Glaw Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_fsl_emb.h | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_fsl_emb.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_fsl_emb.h index a21f529c43d9..8359c06d92d9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_fsl_emb.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_fsl_emb.h @@ -12,9 +12,16 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ /* Performance Monitor Registers */ #define mfpmr(rn) ({unsigned int rval; \ - asm volatile("mfpmr %0," __stringify(rn) \ + asm volatile(".machine push; " \ + ".machine e300; " \ + "mfpmr %0," __stringify(rn) ";" \ + ".machine pop; " \ : "=r" (rval)); rval;}) -#define mtpmr(rn, v) asm volatile("mtpmr " __stringify(rn) ",%0" : : "r" (v)) +#define mtpmr(rn, v) asm volatile(".machine push; " \ + ".machine e300; " \ + "mtpmr " __stringify(rn) ",%0; " \ + ".machine pop; " \ + : : "r" (v)) #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ /* Freescale Book E Performance Monitor APU Registers */