From patchwork Mon Jan 22 17:49:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shrikanth Hegde X-Patchwork-Id: 1889311 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rPYZGmvR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TJd8S4w5Gz23f0 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:52:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rPYZGmvR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TJd8S49Hqz3cPK for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:52:08 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rPYZGmvR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sshegde@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TJd5X45fKz3c5q for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:49:36 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40MHekUM030654; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:26 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=KeUg6p5geUeb/5YLtDehZnb7ENy/rqnJYmLETJS5zEA=; b=rPYZGmvRvTrSHy9pog3AK8894pa5fARralnW3DykbaPMoOhYZWVGgig7PdCzzWW89nwq QIVIL5I4/A+YkywssC2RRMyro5StnWvwIztSlR7nV14dkzmBa/+0vpQtRaPcRUpvhfkk ylylfah7CqqehKiJuk6AArKSYPK5XiKIwGjDyNzXOwBvlR2LUKalyYzJy5DbYNcKtcYI yzu9hLWLqe2vpZSf4OhVGlLfUXJQ1BvqK1n7JFXwKwg9+ECZzkjARtuqK2Ner8oE29aY v/lX3vTD3A4ZwoZ+dqcmUkT7BVGGCxbZhbJKkpF18KFkjin7x2+vYHaXcwyPkR8TKbKs FQ== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vsurfa5q4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:25 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40MHA9CN025298; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:24 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vrtqk1uqp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:24 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 40MHnMpm16974504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:22 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB262004F; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEB12005A; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c1fdab4c-355a-11b2-a85c-ef242fe9efb4.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.53.45]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:49:19 +0000 (GMT) From: Shrikanth Hegde To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] ntfs: remove duplicate ifdefs Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 23:19:03 +0530 Message-Id: <20240122174904.178594-4-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: <20240122174904.178594-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240122174904.178594-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: XeEMsl10Wmu77LMj_tWv9LOPZ8Y6ZYBd X-Proofpoint-GUID: XeEMsl10Wmu77LMj_tWv9LOPZ8Y6ZYBd X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-22_07,2024-01-22_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=841 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401220124 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peterz@infradead.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, anton@tuxera.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" when a ifdef is used in the below manner, second one could be considered as duplicate. ifdef DEFINE_A ...code block... ifdef DEFINE_A ...code block... endif ...code block... endif In the ntfs code, one such pattern was seen. Hence remove that duplicate ifdef. No functional change is intended here. It only aims to improve code readability. Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde --- fs/ntfs/inode.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) -- 2.39.3 diff --git a/fs/ntfs/inode.c b/fs/ntfs/inode.c index aba1e22db4e9..d2c8622d53d1 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/inode.c @@ -2859,11 +2859,9 @@ int ntfs_truncate(struct inode *vi) * * See ntfs_truncate() description above for details. */ -#ifdef NTFS_RW void ntfs_truncate_vfs(struct inode *vi) { ntfs_truncate(vi); } -#endif /** * ntfs_setattr - called from notify_change() when an attribute is being changed