From patchwork Thu Jan 18 08:03:24 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shrikanth Hegde X-Patchwork-Id: 1888249 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=FqnT8Vdu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TGFnw5Mx1z1yQ0 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:12:52 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=FqnT8Vdu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TGFnt6pLGz3c58 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:12:50 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=FqnT8Vdu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sshegde@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TFwJ85XQPz30GC for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 19:04:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40I7vMeD011578; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=he2i3jOgA8ugAT3gEAoGWdurDGiSbKEL1Suh3vTdnWQ=; b=FqnT8Vdu+4klNVAUZNOFJmePrzOyFXCDdMuhtEEUFUIQMhwAzmZSuaztVMjfuzWcGrS+ wmepl0Qk64klA1q/8MSAWI/LuFnKEpQsXhSWtD3fiYsf9pTGhnmE92y4DHkHfdAMDKfU o+WxFX4KVKYRWVO2VR6pmmurMwIM6U8V7AONGVztE8cSYr8M2j87B8UUTM+pfagTpYkd P3M6VsZtiFLdZVxIuDn3FpHKye4a0CJpZf8HnmQxtfbAko/z468v1jPdM1ZfcO6DOfBd KbLrGtSKuwNw/FHp1r7+v8Dx8bv4SkgdXqwGNMT3dv84t2UFPJOtc2uDGkqJ3pGVB/Rt fw== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vq02206hh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 40I74lOb011009; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:07 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3vm57ytc11-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:07 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 40I845W424707822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:05 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C0120040; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F279320043; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c1fdab4c-355a-11b2-a85c-ef242fe9efb4.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.109.201.126]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 08:04:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Shrikanth Hegde To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: remove duplicate ifdefs Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:33:24 +0530 Message-Id: <20240118080326.13137-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: <20240118080326.13137-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240118080326.13137-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 3PWccwYfkYM-DHA16-RytUKNot96V0J9 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 3PWccwYfkYM-DHA16-RytUKNot96V0J9 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.997,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-01-18_04,2024-01-17_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=961 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311290000 definitions=main-2401180056 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 08:12:35 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peterz@infradead.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org, anton@tuxera.com, chandan.babu@oracle.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" when a ifdef is used in the below manner, second one could be considered as duplicate. ifdef DEFINE_A ...code block... ifdef DEFINE_A ...code block... endif ...code block... endif In the scheduler code, there are two places where above pattern can be observed. Hence second ifdef is a duplicate and not needed. Plus a minor comment update to reflect the else case. No functional change is intended here. It only aims to improve code readability. Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde --- kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +--- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.39.3 diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 038eeaf76d2d..1bfb186fd67f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1792,7 +1792,6 @@ static void cpu_util_update_eff(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css); #endif #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL -#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP static void uclamp_update_root_tg(void) { @@ -1898,7 +1897,6 @@ static int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, return result; } #endif -#endif static int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) @@ -2065,7 +2063,7 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void) } } -#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ +#else /* !CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { } static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { } static inline int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p, diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index f2bb83675e4a..6158a6752c25 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -10166,10 +10166,8 @@ static int idle_cpu_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) * be computed and tested before calling idle_cpu_without(). */ -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (rq->ttwu_pending) return 0; -#endif return 1; }