From patchwork Wed Aug 9 19:53:11 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nayna Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 1819566 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=RYig7b3J; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RLgkh247gz1yfl for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:54:52 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=RYig7b3J; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RLgkg6G6zz3bhc for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:54:51 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=RYig7b3J; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nayna@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RLgjN0tMYz300g for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 05:53:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 379Jfo71029839; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:39 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=+Ki1oKIwDxjtgyY+7vdefE9L5j5AW/bixMirZNbv5xM=; b=RYig7b3JKcphxWvSk4V6cjnpIs4hTyvTP/+LhgXsLheBOCBt8WzEoEldb/qhIJJv39Wn lWYdxKpO5gBr4UQJRx10MR/9x79xcme90ZRP5lfWiwmne05tfDU67KuVikzJVRC58kzn zqKw8je6PG3vf+mLmd5jUIGh3lF92ygFW7+WSwa/QNBo42GrEItDiOI3kuZg30mkHF0R x8rSfN06mWx/ejWpJRo6X6TMD5q+dPhl+MWPrzTr1V4H7djiszwRkVa09W/8VJghq0yh lJ05Ba4dww7g4DQwiekrY9GIdxJFv0HkOg5aKx8ia45LI/XyCn4957722ynWBdYLiF5N qw== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3sch06rc28-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Aug 2023 19:53:38 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 379J33EA007552; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:38 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3sa14ykjwt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Aug 2023 19:53:37 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.100]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 379JrY1A61866344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:34 GMT Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB1220040; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E8820043; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-4b5937cc-25c4-11b2-a85c-cea3a66903e4.ibm.com (unknown [9.61.3.84]) by smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 19:53:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Nayna Jain To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] integrity: ignore keys failing CA restrictions on non-UEFI platform Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:53:11 -0400 Message-Id: <20230809195315.1085656-3-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: <20230809195315.1085656-1-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230809195315.1085656-1-nayna@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: vRcGcGXs0NjfjA2kNoxWOM8fnxaoISSN X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: vRcGcGXs0NjfjA2kNoxWOM8fnxaoISSN X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-08-09_17,2023-08-09_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2306200000 definitions=main-2308090171 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eric Snowberg , Paul Moore , Nayna Jain , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On non-UEFI platforms, handle restrict_link_by_ca failures differently. Certificates which do not satisfy CA restrictions on non-UEFI platforms are ignored. Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain Reviewed-and-tested-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/platform_certs/machine_keyring.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/machine_keyring.c b/security/integrity/platform_certs/machine_keyring.c index 7aaed7950b6e..389a6e7c9245 100644 --- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/machine_keyring.c +++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/machine_keyring.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void __init add_to_machine_keyring(const char *source, const void *data, size_t * If the restriction check does not pass and the platform keyring * is configured, try to add it into that keyring instead. */ - if (rc && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) + if (rc && efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) rc = integrity_load_cert(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_PLATFORM, source, data, len, perm);