From patchwork Thu Jun 29 14:31:42 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Dufour X-Patchwork-Id: 1801538 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fIuKUCz0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QsLhh5DgGz1yhT for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:40:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fIuKUCz0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QsLhh0yyQz3cYK for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:40:20 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fIuKUCz0; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ldufour@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QsLdp3ptdz3cbh for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:37:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35TEWahJ021970; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Z3BXx87NONENKyRCVCG4NKF1gcn0Sn0umYhm4oYj4BE=; b=fIuKUCz0Pmj4SSR9tQoOhTzWoXAWk3QunXQ06mBeerhqzJkGg0OwuHDwpsI0yxdPkg+D 0O3X4fFsf97LdXVfN/NSWbLHAKHUs5Q7NGo7M2OwKO9/FXqP8S7DRhfmdzEjiRFXw3B5 RZHZWBxAgljYterwiYttgo/yVlTWNKAUxJJZnSsMfhUcmVbZUCG53TBCn+RPmMjJiEj5 ATqJPJ4pmgne5avWJRG/e7aow3pBFsUNxPZ2lhpId0PSOBuF03qqAaRD+s0Bof3OTvJL D+OiyaM5aDu2lWZ/YLu+a/VGY72snlJMe5zfJgi2xKjsX7OWEZ9YzY3dNpESzJdADmK9 gQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rhbtfr7cs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:34 +0000 Received: from m0360072.ppops.net (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 35TEYFf5029524; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:13 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rhbtfr6d3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:37:13 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35T9UewQ018753; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:55 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rdr453d0k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.100]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 35TEVqtx21955106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:52 GMT Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E4620040; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF0720043; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pomme.tlslab.ibm.com (unknown [9.101.4.33]) by smtpav01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:31:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] cpu/SMT: Move smt/control simple exit cases earlier Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20230629143149.79073-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230629143149.79073-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230629143149.79073-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: znAJTOAkjGFcbZbbUhM-H8vWPDtgTGry X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MdiUQEipbuLwmI_5kVk5Rp4UXK0jmVLn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-06-29_03,2023-06-27_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2305260000 definitions=main-2306290132 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Michael Ellerman Move the simple exit cases, ie. which don't depend on the value written, earlier in the function. That makes it clearer that regardless of the input those states can not be transitioned out of. That does have a user-visible effect, in that the error returned will now always be EPERM/ENODEV for those states, regardless of the value written. Previously writing an invalid value would return EINVAL even when in those states. Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman --- kernel/cpu.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 237394e0574a..c67049bb3fc8 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -2482,6 +2482,12 @@ __store_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { int ctrlval, ret; + if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED) + return -EPERM; + + if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED) + return -ENODEV; + if (sysfs_streq(buf, "on")) ctrlval = CPU_SMT_ENABLED; else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "off")) @@ -2491,12 +2497,6 @@ __store_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, else return -EINVAL; - if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_FORCE_DISABLED) - return -EPERM; - - if (cpu_smt_control == CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED) - return -ENODEV; - ret = lock_device_hotplug_sysfs(); if (ret) return ret;