From patchwork Sat May 27 01:41:32 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Doug Anderson X-Patchwork-Id: 1786703 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jVuYAdq3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QSl0d6mMRz20Pc for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 11:42:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QSl0d2MZ4z3fGf for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 11:42:41 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jVuYAdq3; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::435; helo=mail-pf1-x435.google.com; envelope-from=dianders@chromium.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=jVuYAdq3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QSl0F6sNXz3f80 for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 11:42:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-64d41763796so1181003b3a.2 for ; Fri, 26 May 2023 18:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1685151740; x=1687743740; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KaDACvZxwdpKtf7kTBQLIF7ZNxT8GRJ6++BKiL/JB9M=; b=jVuYAdq3YuUoT9q0ptR3Y7gogUCPfBKK+uzhCs3nYmVmC0ZcHgwMRd0F7jOf1hYEoN iVHyunZrSLGRZ/SUtKN1NZqFCsyZzudfiz0JVDxVcWLyOc754sGNrSqCni0+0DMifrdR CX1zK1B4IcAFWXPw6yd7iZFlWLLQa05o6HrVA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685151740; x=1687743740; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KaDACvZxwdpKtf7kTBQLIF7ZNxT8GRJ6++BKiL/JB9M=; b=a2TbBXR7X2HwyQDI6eMH7hnWi9MbFGn2/hvGSNwAf+fDwJA4HS/TV88N5ymTp1CNRm mMvFQ3ALmBtEj9IPQUpNjDE7mIY9MyZ87j6tUwmB/qyYEWsQkgrp9lukoWDOEJSGOZR4 PuqCHC+XEFdUVOh0DHkOGlLGLD3AAAKJEu9VpHvOs2R9lLP4gYNHbfFOAxW8rmmnGU6X OXUhRdNZdKBu2zbhNIPVLCmapGO0Io01eDtuQuPKnWOBj0oMnbSD4dZO51rheYlN+W1x VUCzxgaQ4Xdme0iXVLUYoSwQCpbhjLX63HTLM28jkAbGvOUZ6Q+RPxvmW80kmN9fdkel 4FHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwB0REJf3oPKm38iRTQBNcd5LJz3vLLA6CVrDXK+6HTjiTSJufh TlhrH8BGmoqfceHM+ppl33PVfw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7idAUslgayGvplEniRBtJYBCvMASeKUJDKY3K4A2M46AA1VPt7NOcvpx5WEYfIrIw0exEmRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2409:b0:63b:8778:99e4 with SMTP id z9-20020a056a00240900b0063b877899e4mr5910255pfh.2.1685151739708; Fri, 26 May 2023 18:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tictac2.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:4015:7255:c79a:26d7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x25-20020aa79199000000b0063b8ddf77f7sm3202440pfa.211.2023.05.26.18.42.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 May 2023 18:42:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Douglas Anderson To: Petr Mladek , Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 02/10] watchdog/hardlockup: HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG must implement watchdog_hardlockup_probe() Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:41:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20230526184139.2.Ic6ebbf307ca0efe91f08ce2c1eb4a037ba6b0700@changeid> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0.rc0.172.g3f132b7071-goog In-Reply-To: <20230527014153.2793931-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20230527014153.2793931-1-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S . Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Right now there is one arch (sparc64) that selects HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG without selecting HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH. Because of that one architecture, we have some special case code in the watchdog core to handle the fact that watchdog_hardlockup_probe() isn't implemented. Let's implement watchdog_hardlockup_probe() for sparc64 and get rid of the special case. As a side effect of doing this, code inspection tells us that we could fix a minor bug where the system won't properly realize that NMI watchdogs are disabled. Specifically, on powerpc if CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG is turned off the arch might still select CONFIG_HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH which selects CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG. Since CONFIG_PPC_WATCHDOG was off then nothing will override the "weak" watchdog_hardlockup_probe() and we'll fallback to looking at CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG. Suggested-by: Petr Mladek Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek --- Though this does fix a minor bug, I didn't mark this as "Fixes" because it's super minor. One could also argue that this wasn't a bug at all but simply was never an implemented feature. The code that added some amount of dynamicness here was commit a994a3147e4c ("watchdog/hardlockup/perf: Implement init time detection of perf") which, as per the title, was only intending to make "perf" dynamic. The old NMI watchdog presumably has never been handled dynamically. arch/Kconfig | 3 ++- arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c | 5 +++++ kernel/watchdog.c | 13 ------------- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index 64d771855ecd..b4f6387b12fe 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -428,7 +428,8 @@ config HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG bool help The arch provides a low level NMI watchdog. It provides - asm/nmi.h, and defines its own arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(). + asm/nmi.h, and defines its own watchdog_hardlockup_probe() and + arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(). config HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH bool diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c index 9d9e29b75c43..17cdfdbf1f3b 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/nmi.c @@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ void arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_touch_nmi_watchdog); +int __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void) +{ + return 0; +} + static void die_nmi(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, int do_panic) { int this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c index 4b9e31edb47f..62230f5b8878 100644 --- a/kernel/watchdog.c +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c @@ -217,19 +217,6 @@ void __weak watchdog_hardlockup_disable(unsigned int cpu) { } */ int __weak __init watchdog_hardlockup_probe(void) { - /* - * If CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG is defined then an architecture - * is assumed to have the hard watchdog available and we return 0. - */ - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG)) - return 0; - - /* - * Hardlockup detectors other than those using CONFIG_HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG - * are required to implement a non-weak version of this probe function - * to tell whether they are available. If they don't override then - * we'll return -ENODEV. - */ return -ENODEV; }