From patchwork Fri Oct 21 05:22:34 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Benjamin Gray X-Patchwork-Id: 1692846 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=P97+UCxH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MttHT6rcsz23jk for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:26:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MttHT48qDz3dwq for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:26:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=P97+UCxH; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bgray@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=P97+UCxH; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MttF41SrZz3c5v for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:24:24 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29L57FtV026989; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:13 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=H3Ff8+4vOgEaHot+i+nLa1kVslHhbZbgIbJsxtA5Z2Q=; b=P97+UCxH/t0RInpXsHh9qSHB4z6dMPp6slneFuWYuHm03qOAJlWEozK/wy2WrSKK6eKm 4WcUOVfSlZZ2zNqNpdzpDzqjoCrN51tACSDDgac13VxyXcHIxs5i7BcsaVCQrDn4NoBA oFMzTOwv6t3okoHp6WNyEQPuG6etA7L7i6g9QrHh90VNcPE+BFDi9ECjiu7yEJtSXWCz AdVuxmZ42F6xlNNpVNtc9Rk02HP8ULnqMyLSlBBrl/j6fx6GjDY63rYD+AKBOc/JXxnT Zb6+YSJlbz4vT7wHBijdPKTKAE38rPgSdWcBHLfOBUkYZsvlW94GvSr/ihIWGYmXSHHE fg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kbma5sn60-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:13 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 29L57Joi027824; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:12 GMT Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kbma5sn5e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 29L5M2GI010258; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:10 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3k7m4jfhmx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:10 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 29L5Of8p52363754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:41 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A91A404D; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926AEA4040; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (unknown [9.192.253.14]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:24:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-0d7fa1cc-2c9d-11b2-a85c-aed20764436d.ibm.com (unknown [9.177.89.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E316E60153; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:24:01 +1100 (AEDT) From: Benjamin Gray To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v8 2/6] powerpc/code-patching: Use WARN_ON and fix check in poking_init Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:22:34 +1100 Message-Id: <20221021052238.580986-3-bgray@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3 In-Reply-To: <20221021052238.580986-1-bgray@linux.ibm.com> References: <20221021052238.580986-1-bgray@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Dt2KvXRtKJ9e2NziI_zjz4oF4gNib6Hj X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: VjYu-hCS7AARbx4qi3DiCE_K2PTOBVA- X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-10-20_13,2022-10-20_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2209130000 definitions=main-2210210029 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ajd@linux.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com, Benjamin Gray , npiggin@gmail.com, cmr@bluescreens.de Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: "Christopher M. Riedl" The latest kernel docs list BUG_ON() as 'deprecated' and that they should be replaced with WARN_ON() (or pr_warn()) when possible. The BUG_ON() in poking_init() warrants a WARN_ON() rather than a pr_warn() since the error condition is deemed "unreachable". Also take this opportunity to fix the failure check in the WARN_ON(): cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, ...) returns a positive integer on success and a negative integer on failure. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray Reviewed-by: Russell Currey --- arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index ad0cf3108dd0..34fc7ac34d91 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -81,16 +81,13 @@ static int text_area_cpu_down(unsigned int cpu) static __ro_after_init DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(poking_init_done); -/* - * Although BUG_ON() is rude, in this case it should only happen if ENOMEM, and - * we judge it as being preferable to a kernel that will crash later when - * someone tries to use patch_instruction(). - */ void __init poking_init(void) { - BUG_ON(!cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, - "powerpc/text_poke:online", text_area_cpu_up, - text_area_cpu_down)); + WARN_ON(cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, + "powerpc/text_poke:online", + text_area_cpu_up, + text_area_cpu_down) < 0); + static_branch_enable(&poking_init_done); }