From patchwork Mon Sep 12 08:20:05 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sathvika Vasireddy X-Patchwork-Id: 1676812 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=id/fNb5c; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MR02D53pQz1ync for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:22:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MR02D4vgxz30Ck for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:22:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=id/fNb5c; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=sv@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=id/fNb5c; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MR00p0hbkz3bYM for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 18:20:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 28C7g17e030107; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=pIVSStzXkzMCQKu51+bqeIkE7v1EnMDNXkIa6OMrcAo=; b=id/fNb5cKZ+tXTaz5pOYmQydK3RtFDBp8af5ir9eJl0DXNTocbPR5U4xPq0OhXmDQXzf ITbjelR9apJLDLaiP2l18HLLqZ0xn0K+avB1RvEb0fwyfLxqByLslc2T9gTUCiWbsSpN LwnaNDkAX8Te+hzDa8/n/YB87SodxXUoChWHBkCDPl/ITr2B1xQc7xIgDeP9E6rTZ6mM CCtVjfnHvXudZOVcPTWWTwRIUZ0I5Xwp2ZjJkqGr8ZoGmLHSqy8bF/bTDYPjDE8bGVua mnuEECS0/IDR4g5DZ+UI85uvtA9kbttlLR2PZvSma+zFAI4QQ5M/pmeT56aA1RMZ/1Vv nA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jj0kv92mc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:41 +0000 Received: from m0098409.ppops.net (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 28C82dZj020858; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:40 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3jj0kv92js-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:40 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 28C86YtE030757; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:37 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3jgj78shqj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:37 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 28C8KZe016843242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:35 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E32A4053; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E587A4040; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c3569c4c-1ef8-11b2-a85c-ee139cda3133.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.91.220]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:20:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Sathvika Vasireddy To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v3 01/16] powerpc: Fix __WARN_FLAGS() for use with Objtool Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 13:50:05 +0530 Message-Id: <20220912082020.226755-2-sv@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220912082020.226755-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220912082020.226755-1-sv@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: uYfVAMj_QzTtDumOlHBmN4dNpWw_8yw6 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: q3e4ZxmwhRFc9ggP1Avx2pkR6w2v0HTN X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.528,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-09-12_04,2022-09-09_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=916 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2209120027 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peterz@infradead.org, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aik@ozlabs.ru, mingo@redhat.com, sv@linux.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mbenes@suse.cz, chenzhongjin@huawei.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 1e688dd2a3d675 ("powerpc/bug: Provide better flexibility to WARN_ON/__WARN_FLAGS() with asm goto") updated __WARN_FLAGS() to use asm goto, and added a call to 'unreachable()' after the asm goto for optimal code generation. With CONFIG_OBJTOOL enabled, 'annotate_unreachable()' statement in 'unreachable()' tries to note down the location of the subsequent instruction in a separate elf section to aid code flow analysis. However, on powerpc, this results in gcc emitting a call to a symbol of size 0. This results in objtool complaining of "unannotated intra-function call" since the target symbol is not a valid function call destination. Objtool wants this annotation for code flow analysis, which we are not yet enabling on powerpc. As such, expand the call to 'unreachable()' in __WARN_FLAGS() without annotate_unreachable(): barrier_before_unreachable(); __builtin_unreachable(); This still results in optimal code generation for __WARN_FLAGS(), while getting rid of the objtool warning. We still need barrier_before_unreachable() to work around gcc bugs 82365 and 106751: - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365 - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106751 Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy Signed-off-by: Sathvika Vasireddy --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h index 61a4736355c2..ef42adb44aa3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h @@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ __label__ __label_warn_on; \ \ WARN_ENTRY("twi 31, 0, 0", BUGFLAG_WARNING | (flags), __label_warn_on); \ - unreachable(); \ + barrier_before_unreachable(); \ + __builtin_unreachable(); \ \ __label_warn_on: \ break; \