From patchwork Fri May 20 11:54:31 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Juerg Haefliger X-Patchwork-Id: 1633935 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=canonical.com header.i=@canonical.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210705 header.b=EhQvCQip; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4L4StV5Pz9z9sG2 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 23:56:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4L4StV4Wylz3cf3 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 23:56:02 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=canonical.com header.i=@canonical.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210705 header.b=EhQvCQip; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=canonical.com (client-ip=185.125.188.122; helo=smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com; envelope-from=juerg.haefliger@canonical.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=canonical.com header.i=@canonical.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210705 header.b=EhQvCQip; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com [185.125.188.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4L4QBQ2qF0z2yjC for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 21:54:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37593F1EE for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:54:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1653047675; bh=deCcyVhVyKD2/JPpSzZpMIDpYKyl3Ap6BwhEK9M4/s8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=EhQvCQipQs6C679f5wbHaAWgWebqcJCgNVKPIWvN4tDLnhQrE3nKVBhmtHf4rEI/t 2khAFnTHV8sJVgPswo7DBOl/WevCVJsN25jxjcf1hry5QyQCYipLDqnUQppAEuUbHS txnz9bMik8H2inBqBBt1zj2oCHXyB4VfHj+GsyhhJ0D88uIKFW0YdyG3crFxqPElCh 7QLMQYbxtN2wif0RwYBjBL/oy6k28jU3RrMJB3TzNE95cGIfeAoY4gi2bnH4ViXFmj nvk/fAjoDt+hKI7HEncBbUuWVk8FgpzVgSI7zLzO1L/aC8wHfw+9sxK2OfidkuZyPB tjG2eHZK4lZ3w== Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id sd38-20020a1709076e2600b006f3e54b1dbcso3905285ejc.4 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 04:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=deCcyVhVyKD2/JPpSzZpMIDpYKyl3Ap6BwhEK9M4/s8=; b=E2n5xgD/ff0e4A42+gL9PFq/gHObOg1EYInQJ0prFBSGi/lBIOaRmakqG21S69nqP8 xZKXndgWDnhbpfg0LSlujhExsMUW404w0W9/BvMc16Y8RDec5szp8J7DbzL15byPLBnK /mGPEUg6x7Yw2WiMR5ZsIZ9Ydd3pjVkR50T8VCFhPFpiIyVjQTb2XhUj6KtQtJ4BUOza H96l76jleVCbEkIzXh6cdzsHerHMXu2ZiLfvGstGVSCKrTIgW18XIire0p8D98ZD3Zn3 9lOqvtP3Ii51aPLYSr7+3Fd1h2tp83GMWYh7YSbOzr1bKhSKLDtKnsCbx8V32YiFVCA8 dDgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tXeQCdYTgleFf7ZoG5c798Vc86CBULsufUrs7rLQynKZM+7dx 3TjmxMT4DhXj2zP7V2iaUES/L9Zn7xuqBxa14mpM2PQ74z9L4ruk3CaFBY9Fud+mkvofEdDUZ2j ID28AG0fDK3FZwpV84jQaucMYisiE+92FinQLo1Bi5Gk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3daa:b0:6fe:88ab:fe8c with SMTP id he42-20020a1709073daa00b006fe88abfe8cmr8136294ejc.575.1653047674687; Fri, 20 May 2022 04:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGYb7iuTm8Rlzr8a4NeJlgaXcvtLbYBbdOK1XLz9DVlSPQcOFRtd66KjcfayizB1DjW9FI2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3daa:b0:6fe:88ab:fe8c with SMTP id he42-20020a1709073daa00b006fe88abfe8cmr8136282ejc.575.1653047674537; Fri, 20 May 2022 04:54:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gollum.fritz.box ([194.191.244.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12-20020aa7c80c000000b0042617ba637esm4231156edt.8.2022.05.20.04.54.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 May 2022 04:54:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Juerg Haefliger X-Google-Original-From: Juerg Haefliger To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Kconfig: Fix indentation Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 13:54:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20220520115431.147593-1-juergh@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 May 2022 23:55:13 +1000 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juerg Haefliger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The convention for indentation seems to be a single tab. Help text is further indented by an additional two whitespaces. Fix the lines that violate these rules. Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger --- arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig index ddd88179110a..fe84628bda64 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/Kconfig @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ config KVM_BOOK3S_HV_NESTED_PMU_WORKAROUND Old nested HV capable Linux guests have a bug where they don't reflect the PMU in-use status of their L2 guest to the L0 host while the L2 PMU registers are live. This can result in loss - of L2 PMU register state, causing perf to not work correctly in + of L2 PMU register state, causing perf to not work correctly in L2 guests. Selecting this option for the L0 host implements a workaround for