From patchwork Fri May 6 08:45:20 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: kajoljain X-Patchwork-Id: 1627448 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ZKDKRedZ; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KvkpM5jqNz9sGT for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 18:52:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KvkpM45Rdz3f51 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 18:52:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ZKDKRedZ; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=kjain@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ZKDKRedZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kvkgr20Mbz3cC5 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 18:46:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2468cZNs032386; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:28 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=11QdNq4pdJCYmxWnGRtMTUmmagcsaniw8sHdhWsIMYo=; b=ZKDKRedZinMWtrOpgFSiR4h1ai7gfu9TDZm+LzzyLnTWylyl4BQuQDZoJQ7mYkHxKlN0 nbXeN4crrmrQI31NnUr4l+LdZI9/2IGhPQqoHDSxSzulImslTdULpvPzJEkI2saDm2Ei 1NdvpQQv4U8ilUDDMd48ltr8+Qz0kWs6cfhlO6lFgxb4ruBGLAZFu8fJTykhOvHuKLtc t9JmDWs6TCQBzezK8B6Dm6s0KS5cRnKVRrWcyHBmI9pfdosR7GctLlH/DsOZ26/UIx9G f92BTuUrvj4uIpEiKKmCqVBzQgk133DPqWbfnquRBJt9Z0TLyA5EuH6+qhfJiohkgy/D lg== Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fw01nrb59-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 08:46:28 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2468gbGG014000; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:25 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3frvr8ppuk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 08:46:25 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2468kMEM35783044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:22 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1974C044; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887BD4C040; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e8dccbcc-2adc-11b2-a85c-bc1f33b9b810.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.19.224]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 May 2022 08:46:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Kajol Jain To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH 11/35] selftest/powerpc/pmu: Add selftest to check PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR option will not crash on any platforms Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 14:15:20 +0530 Message-Id: <20220506084544.56527-12-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20220506084544.56527-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220506084544.56527-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: mOz6t1M_M70kHCIP2bwXM5SndhqM1NBg X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: mOz6t1M_M70kHCIP2bwXM5SndhqM1NBg X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-06_02,2022-05-05_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205060045 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kjain@linux.ibm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com, disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Athira Rajeev With sampling, --intr-regs option is used for capturing interrupt regs. When --intr-regs option is used, PMU code uses is_sier_available() function which uses PMU flags in the code. In environment where platform specific PMU is not registered, PMU flags is not defined. A fix was added in kernel to address crash while accessing is_sier_available() function when pmu is not set. commit f75e7d73bdf7 ("powerpc/perf: Fix crash with is_sier_available when pmu is not set"). Add perf sampling test to exercise this code and make sure enabling intr_regs shouldn't crash in any platform. Testcase uses software event cycles since software event will work even in cases without PMU. Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- .../powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/Makefile | 2 +- .../intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/Makefile index 8d4839cde013..8d4566dac440 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/Makefile @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := mmcr0_exceptionbits_test mmcr0_cc56run_test mmcr0_pmccext_test mmcr1_comb_test mmcr2_l2l3_test mmcr2_fcs_fch_test \ mmcr3_src_test mmcra_thresh_marked_sample_test mmcra_thresh_cmp_test \ mmcra_bhrb_ind_call_test mmcra_bhrb_any_test mmcra_bhrb_cond_test \ - mmcra_bhrb_disable_test bhrb_no_crash_wo_pmu_test + mmcra_bhrb_disable_test bhrb_no_crash_wo_pmu_test intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test top_srcdir = ../../../../../.. include ../../../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..839d2d225da0 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/sampling_tests/intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright 2022, Athira Rajeev, IBM Corp. + */ + +#include +#include + +#include "../event.h" +#include "misc.h" +#include "utils.h" + +/* + * A perf sampling test for making sure + * sampling with -intr-regs doesn't crash + * in any environment, say: + * - With generic compat PMU + * - without any PMU registered + * - With platform specific PMU. + * A fix for crash with intr_regs was + * addressed in commit: f75e7d73bdf7 in kernel. + * + * This testcase exercises this code path by doing + * intr_regs using software event. Software event is + * used since s/w event will work even in platform + * without PMU. + */ +static int intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test(void) +{ + struct event event; + + /* + * Init the event for the sampling test. + * This uses software event which works on + * any platform. + */ + event_init_opts(&event, 0, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE, "cycles"); + + event.attr.sample_period = 1000; + event.attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR; + event.attr.disabled = 1; + + /* + * Return code of event_open is not considered + * since test just expects no crash from using + * PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR. + */ + event_open(&event); + + event_close(&event); + return 0; +} + +int main(void) +{ + return test_harness(intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test, "intr_regs_no_crash_wo_pmu_test"); +}