From patchwork Fri Apr 15 12:29:35 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jakob Koschel X-Patchwork-Id: 1617779 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=NnMy+nbb; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Kfwkd4h0Tz9sFs for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:34:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Kfwkd3RFCz3cg9 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:34:33 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=NnMy+nbb; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62c; helo=mail-ej1-x62c.google.com; envelope-from=jakobkoschel@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=NnMy+nbb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KfwfS6xc3z3bXq for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:30:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id bg10so15160682ejb.4 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:30:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vf75TiqrDs9Xy+FgQuO5VDyKrFCIlVjIyCetakykwl0=; b=NnMy+nbbwu/FZGFdNgPth+OQJ2zH1oy44F8EuK/ZITnBseQ65d4wpQtYyU0GWr25lf XQOU3oOkIsiBEPEF0qJzEOKiAcQFaQgV/B68GaoszGIZ9qRO8CahbsqocqeYNB6NTSf6 PGQcvhwB2dpez64XytqOEnycrIB2/hxEQzdep6Pq7UZ0Yfcbc2F+JKZfTQqPlj3Jtul3 ZD6rIEnYrLwRkSx7G7k39+ga+AZCPgtZEXJb/lNtNcEVKFEi8Q5RMNq9uL2C76cNFGFD Pm2E5tfYntiCGIf2MdYfPhU68NY7qfzgH1P0qg8gQqJeLRI5zEJnKa6ny1SomEzEEscS ZYJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vf75TiqrDs9Xy+FgQuO5VDyKrFCIlVjIyCetakykwl0=; b=HNaIfzcEFJVG3gexg5XgTayIpr+COLo2fBohvI8jC4gsBEmKPZL/NfSD7EFHm+7HJp E4DRTe7k67DCymLQWHC/4IIB+6kmw/JZS2bazqYvudAWgsw+G4Ga+D4UJ9C7NsNMgxPb sLeKf6F1VDNIFoHi55on5p+HOYpAAKwO2Ijjt/4N2soOGrCQ6hz1XRZlWvqQmRgtWR4l 3mlSVk6BSNy0IXk4YLv8OdA05AzXVMn5o+NCyFdxzwuHJYmv2wpftVWqU1+zVX2cIAzV 6tTr2j/NjbmsjT4oLK9YsLtX/5oqnMAg4cMSqYeXY9fYuy1M9MF53iweb7d4gCcWw7g/ AdtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hvYLUf9cXi8gSSGBSUUYqzMhdAY7cAIAg6Hvmpg06O2hXx3tM 62+fEzIBEJQJifUi2PQapuQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyS5BRdJjz7m9bebTrVHa9qnOLqUP9LzEfhGCSHpCFUqwUMkCigLFx49atN5YXIpkbxiNMw+w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7d83:b0:6ce:fee:9256 with SMTP id v3-20020a1709067d8300b006ce0fee9256mr6293515ejo.647.1650025853620; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (i130160.upc-i.chello.nl. [62.195.130.160]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id bo14-20020a170906d04e00b006ce98d9c3e3sm1649533ejb.194.2022.04.15.05.30.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakob Koschel To: "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 06/18] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: refactor mv88e6xxx_port_vlan() Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:29:35 +0200 Message-Id: <20220415122947.2754662-7-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220415122947.2754662-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> References: <20220415122947.2754662-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andrew Lunn , Song Liu , Alexei Starovoitov , Eric Dumazet , Paul Mackerras , Ariel Elior , Florian Fainelli , Daniel Borkmann , Steen Hegelund , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , "Bos, H.J." , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vladimir Oltean , Martin Habets , Paolo Abeni , Vivien Didelot , Bjarni Jonasson , Jiri Pirko , Arnd Bergmann , KP Singh , Christophe JAILLET , Jakob Koschel , Jakub Kicinski , Brian Johannesmeyer , Lars Povlsen , Colin Ian King , Manish Chopra , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Yonghong Song , Edward Cree , Casper Andersson , Xu Wang , Cristiano Giuffrida , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Mike Rapoport Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Vladimir Oltean To avoid bugs and speculative execution exploits due to type-confused pointers at the end of a list_for_each_entry() loop, one measure is to restrict code to not use the iterator variable outside the loop block. In the case of mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(), this isn't a problem, as we never let the loops exit through "natural causes" anyway, by using a "found" variable and then using the last "dp" iterator prior to the break, which is a safe thing to do. Nonetheless, with the expected new syntax, this pattern will no longer be possible. Profit off of the occasion and break the two port finding methods into smaller sub-functions. Somehow, returning a copy of the iterator pointer is still accepted. This change makes it redundant to have a "bool found", since the "dp" from mv88e6xxx_port_vlan() now holds NULL if we haven't found what we were looking for. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli --- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c index b3aa0e5bc842..1f35e89053e6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c @@ -1378,42 +1378,50 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_set_mac_eee(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, return 0; } +static struct dsa_port *mv88e6xxx_find_port(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, + int sw_index, int port) +{ + struct dsa_port *dp; + + list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) + if (dp->ds->index == sw_index && dp->index == port) + return dp; + + return NULL; +} + +static struct dsa_port * +mv88e6xxx_find_port_by_bridge_num(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, + unsigned int bridge_num) +{ + struct dsa_port *dp; + + list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) + if (dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) == bridge_num) + return dp; + + return NULL; +} + /* Mask of the local ports allowed to receive frames from a given fabric port */ static u16 mv88e6xxx_port_vlan(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int dev, int port) { struct dsa_switch *ds = chip->ds; struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst; struct dsa_port *dp, *other_dp; - bool found = false; u16 pvlan; - /* dev is a physical switch */ if (dev <= dst->last_switch) { - list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) { - if (dp->ds->index == dev && dp->index == port) { - /* dp might be a DSA link or a user port, so it - * might or might not have a bridge. - * Use the "found" variable for both cases. - */ - found = true; - break; - } - } - /* dev is a virtual bridge */ + /* dev is a physical switch */ + dp = mv88e6xxx_find_port(dst, dev, port); } else { - list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) { - unsigned int bridge_num = dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp); - - if (bridge_num + dst->last_switch != dev) - continue; - - found = true; - break; - } + /* dev is a virtual bridge */ + dp = mv88e6xxx_find_port_by_bridge_num(dst, + dev - dst->last_switch); } /* Prevent frames from unknown switch or virtual bridge */ - if (!found) + if (!dp) return 0; /* Frames from DSA links and CPU ports can egress any local port */