From patchwork Wed Jan 5 21:47:54 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zi Yan X-Patchwork-Id: 1575871 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sent.com header.i=@sent.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=YzFUupbO; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=GdqAoGtO; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JTjr307k1z9sPC for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 08:52:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JTjr263Nnz30NP for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 08:52:02 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sent.com header.i=@sent.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=YzFUupbO; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=GdqAoGtO; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=sent.com (client-ip=66.111.4.230; helo=new4-smtp.messagingengine.com; envelope-from=zi.yan@sent.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sent.com header.i=@sent.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=YzFUupbO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=GdqAoGtO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JTjm111mmz2xYQ for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 08:48:33 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93E1580565; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:48:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 16:48:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sent.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=cdqW9WkR9DiZi 1wR67hfIXu60iQ9l4qjc+vr1lXC0xM=; b=YzFUupbOB0mt3rO5G0b92O16rBLLK hRO1PcYzYgQFEzEHWizWsOe1vicVABwqhoHyAFiPb2rBhKP9ENunSSLLxXR2LOqL w4G/dvr0VvF9Wi8ocsZ3WCwk1hWCjoRALIrsXYOT2NcdAyDPXaaPaL2Il0R7CYMT iAUgh9u6HRpE7fX2sShq3A81ezaOag/v8XsqGvaQqNx8WqPjgOXabPv5vHAtmbLc ZByizcysMtdU3kPJY5iTYZOLgWRB7E1jaRcM2txtfyKO+bK2SMYzfm4gNwFj7nmB KJ5bZ1GGgH0RuE5fRBa5K0YVVk1Rt/NA4m50Ur6E40t2BqJ0/PmHI5iyQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=cdqW9WkR9DiZi1wR67hfIXu60iQ9l4qjc+vr1lXC0xM=; b=GdqAoGtO xU/Ega15jpW53pP7JWCIiLIS+MSEkLp1y/6DIHhkoX6f5mdHYjhpIY6/B7kFJAYU MJjbSQ6qd6BTwCSgzj68oBNGCMsXnQIemUzlghy28uS0PpaeDwrkLO0xQ7M02ePq s26YNSmGBdNYE79yhlXZh5K8Az9DedUHScDL3d30e9hKGw9MEEGYR7W9xXOtwwQY 0sqA4PJVWq4O5+CaBlP4PYKFbzYfkWd56S1Yh+hKTCTUGxK9YK0L9V65KWZloKPd 2lFAkT+4M7HOS1BRvJ6AZdAnuUnm9snqSPFIU1xAvLjpCQei2ncVNWqvIzUYYvhO bXTjpr0jzSFAaw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefjedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkffojghfrhgggfestdhqredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkghiucgj rghnuceoiihirdihrghnsehsvghnthdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieejue dvueduuefhgefhheeiuedvtedvuefgieegveetueeiueehtdegudehfeelnecuvehluhhs thgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepiihirdihrghnsehsvg hnthdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:48:26 -0500 (EST) From: Zi Yan To: David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 6/8] mm: cma: use pageblock_order as the single alignment Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:47:54 -0500 Message-Id: <20220105214756.91065-7-zi.yan@sent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220105214756.91065-1-zi.yan@sent.com> References: <20220105214756.91065-1-zi.yan@sent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Zi Yan Cc: Mel Gorman , Zi Yan , Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Eric Ren , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig , Vlastimil Babka , Marek Szyprowski Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Zi Yan Now alloc_contig_range() works at pageblock granularity. Change CMA allocation, which uses alloc_contig_range(), to use pageblock_order alignment. Signed-off-by: Zi Yan --- include/linux/mmzone.h | 5 +---- kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 2 +- mm/cma.c | 6 ++---- mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index 0aa549653e4e..d28a02a893d6 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h @@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ enum migratetype { * * The way to use it is to change migratetype of a range of * pageblocks to MIGRATE_CMA which can be done by - * __free_pageblock_cma() function. What is important though - * is that a range of pageblocks must be aligned to - * MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES should biggest page be bigger than - * a single pageblock. + * __free_pageblock_cma() function. */ MIGRATE_CMA, #endif diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c index 3d63d91cba5c..ac35b14b0786 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static const struct reserved_mem_ops rmem_cma_ops = { static int __init rmem_cma_setup(struct reserved_mem *rmem) { - phys_addr_t align = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order); + phys_addr_t align = PAGE_SIZE << pageblock_order; phys_addr_t mask = align - 1; unsigned long node = rmem->fdt_node; bool default_cma = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "linux,cma-default", NULL); diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c index bc9ca8f3c487..d171158bd418 100644 --- a/mm/cma.c +++ b/mm/cma.c @@ -180,8 +180,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, return -EINVAL; /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */ - alignment = PAGE_SIZE << - max_t(unsigned long, MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order); + alignment = PAGE_SIZE << pageblock_order; /* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */ if (!IS_ALIGNED(alignment >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1 << order_per_bit)) @@ -268,8 +267,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t base, * migratetype page by page allocator's buddy algorithm. In the case, * you couldn't get a contiguous memory, which is not what we want. */ - alignment = max(alignment, (phys_addr_t)PAGE_SIZE << - max_t(unsigned long, MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order)); + alignment = max(alignment, (phys_addr_t)PAGE_SIZE << pageblock_order); if (fixed && base & (alignment - 1)) { ret = -EINVAL; pr_err("Region at %pa must be aligned to %pa bytes\n", diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index faee7637740a..63d76f436ed1 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -9013,8 +9013,8 @@ static inline void split_free_page_into_pageblocks(struct page *free_page, * be either of the two. * @gfp_mask: GFP mask to use during compaction * - * The PFN range does not have to be pageblock or MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES - * aligned. The PFN range must belong to a single zone. + * The PFN range does not have to be pageblock aligned. The PFN range must + * belong to a single zone. * * The first thing this routine does is attempt to MIGRATE_ISOLATE all * pageblocks in the range. Once isolated, the pageblocks should not @@ -9130,7 +9130,7 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, ret = 0; /* - * Pages from [start, end) are within a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES + * Pages from [start, end) are within a pageblock_nr_pages * aligned blocks that are marked as MIGRATE_ISOLATE. What's * more, all pages in [start, end) are free in page allocator. * What we are going to do is to allocate all pages from