From patchwork Tue Aug 17 06:39:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Leonardo_Br=C3=A1s?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1517572 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=HCd7Bbfb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GphMN02mwz9sRN for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:44:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GphMM6Jf0z3dSD for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:43:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=HCd7Bbfb; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a; helo=mail-qt1-x82a.google.com; envelope-from=leobras.c@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=HCd7Bbfb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GphHL22Rfz2yWr for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:40:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id b1so16381186qtx.0 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:40:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a2LhOT8wKXwFFKbj1q2vhWVrDkR6KFzmfHIVvRI42P8=; b=HCd7BbfbzjyuSQoAZBY0KXbca4qPV0s6Yn9+ktNA336FnJIGq3/rfhl6wo7WDrDMiX vLV9LJ2Ab7BNCx2BnEmj90YUuOJ7KhP+qGcIC0Qjh3q3x8joV1k5N2lx/84KjAOFDVYw llnhsznIlOY08zI3WvuSwiwWsT7nOpXV8+YXK7cQt7Io2qBkaVkwrNO9/qbN4+h4dfNg uvQWfqaXnPPV+YrfzeL9dDI9bvaYFudxQQJqz6BGST85a95uXUho/74BuBDknSWhwcV0 HqcUe+uva4TdnVSgR/sjvYtI37oqNwXdrPt6ztsQBqWnkyayFCLpc4dbYr+Bl2U+WndR N6Pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a2LhOT8wKXwFFKbj1q2vhWVrDkR6KFzmfHIVvRI42P8=; b=TzewaM7WhuVS//569KFqCbZbIfgwHf/zULobLtk8OlCN9ru6+jisZKf3YTWRqjiomt TGcy95EgfybSk7CsIIkXCMb6V/cJcJBvhP+Bc/UuzzW+u6maptb9jXjwpCPqyNeDXa6R hLz6RjR8SwKX8R0z+GjgINzanl+qEz342Zo56dsm0vFsC+lnfDj7IMm6oyBiqk7IMhZx 0JgWUT2nsMwJniFEmHkxvhDI73PBVkSGbhvrDzon9AqOkglNAUJY5SV8ojut+NBO47mA 7NQ1zOlXei4wNl7Dnsrl+BfND8l/l2ZLRh9xzxNvjTI+8D6P/1AR9lkfPoai3diHhikb dmGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HnsoRUBn1MGEUrcGYuEa/Y8+Tq9sln8WVdSPO3cMpXSUKvOQL d7n87umNTlojYiXSz2dXgjk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTPnmO3ONGgzNpn00puAX0SOcGYaRn4jh7/kafHfY84xLNphrzfIIMPtJyZHOWESRjWskZFg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:665a:: with SMTP id j26mr1639544qtp.173.1629182427741; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LeoBras.redhat.com ([2804:431:c7f0:30b2:5c9e:50:88f3:269a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm526938qth.29.2021.08.16.23.40.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:40:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Leonardo Bras To: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Leonardo Bras , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Frederic Barrat , David Gibson , Nicolin Chen , kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH v6 05/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Allow DDW windows starting at 0x00 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 03:39:23 -0300 Message-Id: <20210817063929.38701-6-leobras.c@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210817063929.38701-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> References: <20210817063929.38701-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" enable_ddw() currently returns the address of the DMA window, which is considered invalid if has the value 0x00. Also, it only considers valid an address returned from find_existing_ddw if it's not 0x00. Changing this behavior makes sense, given the users of enable_ddw() only need to know if direct mapping is possible. It can also allow a DMA window starting at 0x00 to be used. This will be helpful for using a DDW with indirect mapping, as the window address will be different than 0x00, but it will not map the whole partition. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 36 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c index 712d1667144a..b34b473bbdc1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c @@ -853,25 +853,26 @@ static void remove_ddw(struct device_node *np, bool remove_prop) np, ret); } -static u64 find_existing_ddw(struct device_node *pdn, int *window_shift) +static bool find_existing_ddw(struct device_node *pdn, u64 *dma_addr, int *window_shift) { struct direct_window *window; const struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *direct64; - u64 dma_addr = 0; + bool found = false; spin_lock(&direct_window_list_lock); /* check if we already created a window and dupe that config if so */ list_for_each_entry(window, &direct_window_list, list) { if (window->device == pdn) { direct64 = window->prop; - dma_addr = be64_to_cpu(direct64->dma_base); + *dma_addr = be64_to_cpu(direct64->dma_base); *window_shift = be32_to_cpu(direct64->window_shift); + found = true; break; } } spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock); - return dma_addr; + return found; } static struct direct_window *ddw_list_new_entry(struct device_node *pdn, @@ -1161,20 +1162,20 @@ static int iommu_get_page_shift(u32 query_page_size) * pdn: the parent pe node with the ibm,dma_window property * Future: also check if we can remap the base window for our base page size * - * returns the dma offset for use by the direct mapped DMA code. + * returns true if can map all pages (direct mapping), false otherwise.. */ -static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) +static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) { int len = 0, ret; int max_ram_len = order_base_2(ddw_memory_hotplug_max()); struct ddw_query_response query; struct ddw_create_response create; int page_shift; - u64 dma_addr; struct device_node *dn; u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE]; struct direct_window *window; struct property *win64; + bool ddw_enabled = false; struct dynamic_dma_window_prop *ddwprop; struct failed_ddw_pdn *fpdn; bool default_win_removed = false; @@ -1186,9 +1187,10 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) mutex_lock(&direct_window_init_mutex); - dma_addr = find_existing_ddw(pdn, &len); - if (dma_addr != 0) + if (find_existing_ddw(pdn, &dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset, &len)) { + ddw_enabled = true; goto out_unlock; + } /* * If we already went through this for a previous function of @@ -1342,7 +1344,8 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) list_add(&window->list, &direct_window_list); spin_unlock(&direct_window_list_lock); - dma_addr = be64_to_cpu(ddwprop->dma_base); + dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = be64_to_cpu(ddwprop->dma_base); + ddw_enabled = true; goto out_unlock; out_free_window: @@ -1374,10 +1377,10 @@ static u64 enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) * as RAM, then we failed to create a window to cover persistent * memory and need to set the DMA limit. */ - if (pmem_present && dma_addr && (len == max_ram_len)) - dev->dev.bus_dma_limit = dma_addr + (1ULL << len); + if (pmem_present && ddw_enabled && (len == max_ram_len)) + dev->dev.bus_dma_limit = dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset + (1ULL << len); - return dma_addr; + return ddw_enabled; } static void pci_dma_dev_setup_pSeriesLP(struct pci_dev *dev) @@ -1456,11 +1459,8 @@ static bool iommu_bypass_supported_pSeriesLP(struct pci_dev *pdev, u64 dma_mask) break; } - if (pdn && PCI_DN(pdn)) { - pdev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = enable_ddw(pdev, pdn); - if (pdev->dev.archdata.dma_offset) - return true; - } + if (pdn && PCI_DN(pdn)) + return enable_ddw(pdev, pdn); return false; }