From patchwork Fri Jul 16 08:27:53 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Leonardo_Br=C3=A1s?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1506065 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=MKISFQEz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GR4GY3rcFz9sW8 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:31:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4GR4GY32gQz3dgK for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:31:49 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=MKISFQEz; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::735; helo=mail-qk1-x735.google.com; envelope-from=leobras.c@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=MKISFQEz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GR4BV10Kpz308m for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 18:28:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id s6so7923446qkc.8 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:28:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iXGgb/5Va0eqpRGTSVzjW8LDpHV/dLXtU//ErgInw+M=; b=MKISFQEzulngPloG/c1AkFIgXCAZxuKeEXjHi2jlqZUoA3XrTwiil4nya8QLpqNNqZ tJ5KQJA7qgN/ENmBMCHrk0j0+wKSz5uopBGjXmHl4HWx0v3MVcmo+ohsVbcuuDjoLDjE ok7uQXndColbCJNlYV76QLS6Y6Sy6zW21BNi/GbKNDUQcoUd+j2pikDx/Heec07H0Wv5 RilMrCbS8Dr2DssaJDj+Qajm/33piDPSdBx4UTDLN329L3bC2JxNdxV/fNv2tbmFl/hF 5SM4UYUqGjKaY6NZd6bGbid6Oq254vtdLOshCGS2Q7zO/+TGFYZ0NuWhSAeY4eWgbM/7 pWNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iXGgb/5Va0eqpRGTSVzjW8LDpHV/dLXtU//ErgInw+M=; b=r7jb0AtJemMXBz966r8IloByDSTxg9knxM67bWp/AIrovO2xu2S6jFQXh9IJxvRah6 oGkdoklgTlA1FwlZFSWeaZQIpV5s7RfKgrufA982gD+PjWs8oDpTxG7+KqSpX2swPBrB x8Vc+kJsMpgb3cGYEDO7t38Xzpu2gwVL8OX0EY/80PT6wc1wqtInANnmEXHb5ZmbHcgt cjxBHkWDqW/qOa8mgVyatQedDGOwfuQP4/KBFBoI+PVveGqe7ZLejsPz3AXJ2wlxnKyq oTJuUcPjzno9zegisV4ArXllKCwOJfeHzmf7fJC/LR46stcv4pKwW5Hn4Npu4XqQ6VRL D+Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530etX6a2HSwmtxuZPchmyJLRmdkfsyeXO3On8YopND5QAc+MNrS vfHkF0owaN9GI8QUOnoNgGQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmLvmTbw6c+J0LkX71SrVmkzTc2XGeAjYD7caA5SiZG0Ttv/ab891S5JLeRlFZmD3/pQ5Eeg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:2d04:: with SMTP id t4mr8839951qkh.160.1626424096100; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LeoBras.redhat.com ([2804:14c:482:92eb:ffdf:6b35:b94d:258]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q199sm3603540qka.112.2021.07.16.01.28.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Jul 2021 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Leonardo Bras To: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Leonardo Bras , Alexey Kardashevskiy , David Gibson , kernel test robot , Nicolin Chen , Frederic Barrat Subject: [PATCH v5 08/11] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Update remove_dma_window() to accept property name Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 05:27:53 -0300 Message-Id: <20210716082755.428187-9-leobras.c@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210716082755.428187-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> References: <20210716082755.428187-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Update remove_dma_window() so it can be used to remove DDW with a given property name. This enables the creation of new property names for DDW, so we can have different usage for it, like indirect mapping. Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy --- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c index 108c3dcca686..17c6f4706e76 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c @@ -830,31 +830,32 @@ static void remove_dma_window(struct device_node *np, u32 *ddw_avail, np, ret, ddw_avail[DDW_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WIN], liobn); } -static void remove_ddw(struct device_node *np, bool remove_prop) +static int remove_ddw(struct device_node *np, bool remove_prop, const char *win_name) { struct property *win; u32 ddw_avail[DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE]; int ret = 0; + win = of_find_property(np, win_name, NULL); + if (!win) + return -EINVAL; + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &ddw_avail[0], DDW_APPLICABLE_SIZE); if (ret) - return; - - win = of_find_property(np, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, NULL); - if (!win) - return; + return 0; if (win->length >= sizeof(struct dynamic_dma_window_prop)) remove_dma_window(np, ddw_avail, win); if (!remove_prop) - return; + return 0; ret = of_remove_property(np, win); if (ret) pr_warn("%pOF: failed to remove direct window property: %d\n", np, ret); + return 0; } static bool find_existing_ddw(struct device_node *pdn, u64 *dma_addr, int *window_shift) @@ -907,7 +908,7 @@ static int find_existing_ddw_windows(void) for_each_node_with_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME) { direct64 = of_get_property(pdn, DIRECT64_PROPNAME, &len); if (!direct64 || len < sizeof(*direct64)) { - remove_ddw(pdn, true); + remove_ddw(pdn, true, DIRECT64_PROPNAME); continue; } @@ -1382,7 +1383,7 @@ static bool enable_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, struct device_node *pdn) kfree(win64); out_remove_win: - remove_ddw(pdn, true); + remove_ddw(pdn, true, DIRECT64_PROPNAME); out_failed: if (default_win_removed) @@ -1547,7 +1548,7 @@ static int iommu_reconfig_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long acti * we have to remove the property when releasing * the device node. */ - remove_ddw(np, false); + remove_ddw(np, false, DIRECT64_PROPNAME); if (pci && pci->table_group) iommu_pseries_free_group(pci->table_group, np->full_name);