From patchwork Thu Jul 23 09:08:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ravi Bangoria X-Patchwork-Id: 1334655 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC6J42xSYz9sQt for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:20:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC6J428SSzDqtR for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:20:36 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BC62d1RlpzDr28 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 19:08:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06N93JOB120586; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 05:08:46 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32f23g0nx1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 05:08:46 -0400 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 06N94IUw124825; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 05:08:45 -0400 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32f23g0nw4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 05:08:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06N96JUB017391; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:08:43 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32brq837c7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:08:43 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 06N97ETJ55837138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:07:14 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D914C040; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:08:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961774C04A; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:08:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bangoria.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.199.40.160]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:08:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Ravi Bangoria To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, mikey@neuling.org Subject: [PATCH v5 02/10] powerpc/watchpoint: Fix DAWR exception constraint Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 14:38:05 +0530 Message-Id: <20200723090813.303838-3-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200723090813.303838-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200723090813.303838-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-23_03:2020-07-22, 2020-07-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007230069 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, rogealve@br.ibm.com, miltonm@us.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, jolsa@kernel.org, jniethe5@gmail.com, pedromfc@br.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Pedro Miraglia Franco de Carvalho noticed that on p8/p9, DAR value is inconsistent with different type of load/store. Like for byte,word etc. load/stores, DAR is set to the address of the first byte of overlap between watch range and real access. But for quadword load/ store it's sometime set to the address of the first byte of real access whereas sometime set to the address of the first byte of overlap. This issue has been fixed in p10. In p10(ISA 3.1), DAR is always set to the address of the first byte of overlap. Commit 27985b2a640e ("powerpc/watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly") wrongly assumes that DAR is set to the address of the first byte of overlap for all load/stores on p8/p9 as well. Fix that. With the fix, we now rely on 'ea' provided by analyse_instr(). If analyse_instr() fails, generate event unconditionally on p8/p9, and on p10 generate event only if DAR is within a DAWR range. Note: 8xx is not affected. Fixes: 27985b2a640e ("powerpc/watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly") Fixes: 74c6881019b7 ("powerpc/watchpoint: Prepare handler to handle more than one watchpoint") Reported-by: Pedro Miraglia Franco de Carvalho Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria --- arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 031e6defc08e..a971e22aea81 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -498,11 +498,11 @@ static bool dar_in_user_range(unsigned long dar, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info return ((info->address <= dar) && (dar - info->address < info->len)); } -static bool dar_user_range_overlaps(unsigned long dar, int size, - struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) +static bool ea_user_range_overlaps(unsigned long ea, int size, + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) { - return ((dar < info->address + info->len) && - (dar + size > info->address)); + return ((ea < info->address + info->len) && + (ea + size > info->address)); } static bool dar_in_hw_range(unsigned long dar, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) @@ -515,20 +515,22 @@ static bool dar_in_hw_range(unsigned long dar, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) return ((hw_start_addr <= dar) && (hw_end_addr > dar)); } -static bool dar_hw_range_overlaps(unsigned long dar, int size, - struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) +static bool ea_hw_range_overlaps(unsigned long ea, int size, + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) { unsigned long hw_start_addr, hw_end_addr; hw_start_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(info->address, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE); hw_end_addr = ALIGN(info->address + info->len, HW_BREAKPOINT_SIZE); - return ((dar < hw_end_addr) && (dar + size > hw_start_addr)); + return ((ea < hw_end_addr) && (ea + size > hw_start_addr)); } /* * If hw has multiple DAWR registers, we also need to check all * dawrx constraint bits to confirm this is _really_ a valid event. + * If type is UNKNOWN, but privilege level matches, consider it as + * a positive match. */ static bool check_dawrx_constraints(struct pt_regs *regs, int type, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) @@ -553,7 +555,8 @@ static bool check_dawrx_constraints(struct pt_regs *regs, int type, * including extraneous exception. Otherwise return false. */ static bool check_constraints(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst instr, - int type, int size, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) + unsigned long ea, int type, int size, + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) { bool in_user_range = dar_in_user_range(regs->dar, info); bool dawrx_constraints; @@ -569,22 +572,27 @@ static bool check_constraints(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst instr, } if (unlikely(ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0)))) { - if (in_user_range) - return true; + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && + !dar_in_hw_range(regs->dar, info)) + return false; - if (dar_in_hw_range(regs->dar, info)) { - info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; - return true; - } - return false; + return true; } dawrx_constraints = check_dawrx_constraints(regs, type, info); - if (dar_user_range_overlaps(regs->dar, size, info)) + if (type == UNKNOWN) { + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && + !dar_in_hw_range(regs->dar, info)) + return false; + return dawrx_constraints; + } - if (dar_hw_range_overlaps(regs->dar, size, info)) { + if (ea_user_range_overlaps(ea, size, info)) + return dawrx_constraints; + + if (ea_hw_range_overlaps(ea, size, info)) { if (dawrx_constraints) { info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; return true; @@ -594,7 +602,7 @@ static bool check_constraints(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst instr, } static void get_instr_detail(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst *instr, - int *type, int *size, bool *larx_stcx) + int *type, int *size, unsigned long *ea) { struct instruction_op op; @@ -602,16 +610,18 @@ static void get_instr_detail(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst *instr, return; analyse_instr(&op, regs, *instr); - - /* - * Set size = 8 if analyse_instr() fails. If it's a userspace - * watchpoint(valid or extraneous), we can notify user about it. - * If it's a kernel watchpoint, instruction emulation will fail - * in stepping_handler() and watchpoint will be disabled. - */ *type = GETTYPE(op.type); - *size = !(*type == UNKNOWN) ? GETSIZE(op.type) : 8; - *larx_stcx = (*type == LARX || *type == STCX); + *ea = op.ea; +#ifdef __powerpc64__ + if (!(regs->msr & MSR_64BIT)) + *ea &= 0xffffffffUL; +#endif + *size = GETSIZE(op.type); +} + +static bool is_larx_stcx_instr(int type) +{ + return type == LARX || type == STCX; } /* @@ -678,7 +688,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) struct ppc_inst instr = ppc_inst(0); int type = 0; int size = 0; - bool larx_stcx = false; + unsigned long ea; /* Disable breakpoints during exception handling */ hw_breakpoint_disable(); @@ -692,7 +702,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) rcu_read_lock(); if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)) - get_instr_detail(regs, &instr, &type, &size, &larx_stcx); + get_instr_detail(regs, &instr, &type, &size, &ea); for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) { bp[i] = __this_cpu_read(bp_per_reg[i]); @@ -702,7 +712,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) info[i] = counter_arch_bp(bp[i]); info[i]->type &= ~HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; - if (check_constraints(regs, instr, type, size, info[i])) { + if (check_constraints(regs, instr, ea, type, size, info[i])) { if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(0))) { handler_error(bp[i], info[i]); @@ -744,7 +754,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) } if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)) { - if (larx_stcx) { + if (is_larx_stcx_instr(type)) { for (i = 0; i < nr_wp_slots(); i++) { if (!hit[i]) continue;