diff mbox series

[V2,07/15] powerpc/ps3: Convert half completion to rcuwait

Message ID 20200318204408.102694393@linutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show
Series Lock ordering documentation and annotation for lockdep | expand

Commit Message

Thomas Gleixner March 18, 2020, 8:43 p.m. UTC
The PS3 notification interrupt and kthread use a hacked up completion to
communicate. Since we're wanting to change the completion implementation and
this is abuse anyway, replace it with a simple rcuwait since there is only ever
the one waiter.

AFAICT the kthread uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to not increase loadavg, kthreads
cannot receive signals by default and this one doesn't look different. Use
TASK_IDLE instead.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
V2: New patch to avoid the magic completion wait variant
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior March 19, 2020, 9 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2020-03-18 21:43:09 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> @@ -725,12 +728,12 @@ static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int res;
>  
> -	init_completion(&dev->done);
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
>  	res = write ? lv1_storage_write(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
>  					&dev->tag)
>  		    : lv1_storage_read(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
>  				       &dev->tag);
> +	dev->done = false;
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
>  	if (res) {
>  		pr_err("%s:%u: %s failed %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, op, res);
> @@ -738,14 +741,10 @@ static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
>  	}
>  	pr_debug("%s:%u: notification %s issued\n", __func__, __LINE__, op);
>  
> -	res = wait_event_interruptible(dev->done.wait,
> -				       dev->done.done || kthread_should_stop());
> +	rcuwait_wait_event(&dev->wait, dev->done || kthread_should_stop(), TASK_IDLE);
> +
…

Not sure it matters but this struct `dev' is allocated on stack. Should
the interrupt fire *before* rcuwait_wait_event() set wait.task to NULL
then it is of random value on the first invocation of rcuwait_wake_up().
->

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
index 197347c3c0b24..e87360a0fb40d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
@@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ static int ps3_probe_thread(void *data)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock_init(&dev.lock);
+	rcuwait_init(&dev.wait);
 
 	res = request_irq(irq, ps3_notification_interrupt, 0,
 			  "ps3_notification", &dev);


Sebastian
Peter Zijlstra March 19, 2020, 9:18 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:00:24AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-03-18 21:43:09 [+0100], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> > @@ -725,12 +728,12 @@ static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	int res;
> >  
> > -	init_completion(&dev->done);
> >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
> >  	res = write ? lv1_storage_write(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
> >  					&dev->tag)
> >  		    : lv1_storage_read(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
> >  				       &dev->tag);
> > +	dev->done = false;
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
> >  	if (res) {
> >  		pr_err("%s:%u: %s failed %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, op, res);
> > @@ -738,14 +741,10 @@ static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
> >  	}
> >  	pr_debug("%s:%u: notification %s issued\n", __func__, __LINE__, op);
> >  
> > -	res = wait_event_interruptible(dev->done.wait,
> > -				       dev->done.done || kthread_should_stop());
> > +	rcuwait_wait_event(&dev->wait, dev->done || kthread_should_stop(), TASK_IDLE);
> > +
> …
> 
> Not sure it matters but this struct `dev' is allocated on stack. Should
> the interrupt fire *before* rcuwait_wait_event() set wait.task to NULL
> then it is of random value on the first invocation of rcuwait_wake_up().
> ->
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> index 197347c3c0b24..e87360a0fb40d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
> @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ static int ps3_probe_thread(void *data)
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&dev.lock);
> +	rcuwait_init(&dev.wait);
>  
>  	res = request_irq(irq, ps3_notification_interrupt, 0,
>  			  "ps3_notification", &dev);
> 

Very good, sorry for that.
Davidlohr Bueso March 19, 2020, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>AFAICT the kthread uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to not increase loadavg, kthreads
>cannot receive signals by default and this one doesn't look different. Use
>TASK_IDLE instead.

Hmm it seems in general this needs to be done kernel-wide. This kthread abuse of
TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE seems to be a common thing. There's also the users doing
schedule_timeout_interruptible()...

Thanks,
Davidlohr
Christoph Hellwig March 19, 2020, 10:04 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The PS3 notification interrupt and kthread use a hacked up completion to
> communicate. Since we're wanting to change the completion implementation and
> this is abuse anyway, replace it with a simple rcuwait since there is only ever
> the one waiter.
> 
> AFAICT the kthread uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to not increase loadavg, kthreads
> cannot receive signals by default and this one doesn't look different. Use
> TASK_IDLE instead.

I think the right fix here is to jut convert the thing to a threaded
interrupt handler and kill off the stupid kthread.

But I wonder how alive the whole PS3 support is to start with..
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior March 19, 2020, 10:26 a.m. UTC | #5
On 2020-03-19 03:04:59 [-0700], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> But I wonder how alive the whole PS3 support is to start with..

OtherOS can only be used on "old" PS3 which do not have have their
firmware upgraded past version 3.21, released April 1, 2010 [0].
It was not possible to install OtherOS on PS3-slim and I don't remember
if it was a successor or a budget version (but it had lower power
consumption as per my memory).
*I* remember from back then that a few universities bought quite a few
of them and used them as a computation cluster. However, whatever broke
over the last 10 years is broken.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OtherOS

Sebastian
Geoff Levand March 20, 2020, 12:01 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi,

On 3/19/20 3:26 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-03-19 03:04:59 [-0700], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> But I wonder how alive the whole PS3 support is to start with..
> 
> OtherOS can only be used on "old" PS3 which do not have have their
> firmware upgraded past version 3.21, released April 1, 2010 [0].
> It was not possible to install OtherOS on PS3-slim and I don't remember
> if it was a successor or a budget version (but it had lower power
> consumption as per my memory).
> *I* remember from back then that a few universities bought quite a few
> of them and used them as a computation cluster. However, whatever broke
> over the last 10 years is broken.
> 
> [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OtherOS
There are still PS3-Linux users out there.  They generally use firmware
and other tools available through the 'hacker' communities that allow
Linux to be run on more than just the 'officially supported' platforms.

Anyway, the change to use rcuwait seems fine if that's needed for the
completion re-work.  I'll try to do some testing with the patch set
next week.

-Geoff
Michael Ellerman March 20, 2020, 12:45 a.m. UTC | #7
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> writes:
> On 2020-03-19 03:04:59 [-0700], Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> But I wonder how alive the whole PS3 support is to start with..
>
> OtherOS can only be used on "old" PS3 which do not have have their
> firmware upgraded past version 3.21, released April 1, 2010 [0].
> It was not possible to install OtherOS on PS3-slim and I don't remember
> if it was a successor or a budget version (but it had lower power
> consumption as per my memory).
> *I* remember from back then that a few universities bought quite a few
> of them and used them as a computation cluster. However, whatever broke
> over the last 10 years is broken.
>
> [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OtherOS

Last time I asked on the list there were still a handful of users.

And I had a patch submitted from a user as recently as last October, so
it still has some life.

cheers
Thomas Gleixner March 21, 2020, 10:41 a.m. UTC | #8
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The PS3 notification interrupt and kthread use a hacked up completion to
>> communicate. Since we're wanting to change the completion implementation and
>> this is abuse anyway, replace it with a simple rcuwait since there is only ever
>> the one waiter.
>> 
>> AFAICT the kthread uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to not increase loadavg, kthreads
>> cannot receive signals by default and this one doesn't look different. Use
>> TASK_IDLE instead.
>
> I think the right fix here is to jut convert the thing to a threaded
> interrupt handler and kill off the stupid kthread.

That'd be a major surgery.

> But I wonder how alive the whole PS3 support is to start with..

There seem to be a few enthusiast left which have a Other-OS capable PS3

Thanks,

        tglx
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/rcuwait.h>
 
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 #include <asm/lv1call.h>
@@ -670,7 +671,8 @@  struct ps3_notification_device {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	u64 tag;
 	u64 lv1_status;
-	struct completion done;
+	struct rcuwait wait;
+	bool done;
 };
 
 enum ps3_notify_type {
@@ -712,7 +714,8 @@  static irqreturn_t ps3_notification_inte
 		pr_debug("%s:%u: completed, status 0x%llx\n", __func__,
 			 __LINE__, status);
 		dev->lv1_status = status;
-		complete(&dev->done);
+		dev->done = true;
+		rcuwait_wake_up(&dev->wait);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
@@ -725,12 +728,12 @@  static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int res;
 
-	init_completion(&dev->done);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
 	res = write ? lv1_storage_write(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
 					&dev->tag)
 		    : lv1_storage_read(dev->sbd.dev_id, 0, 0, 1, 0, lpar,
 				       &dev->tag);
+	dev->done = false;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
 	if (res) {
 		pr_err("%s:%u: %s failed %d\n", __func__, __LINE__, op, res);
@@ -738,14 +741,10 @@  static int ps3_notification_read_write(s
 	}
 	pr_debug("%s:%u: notification %s issued\n", __func__, __LINE__, op);
 
-	res = wait_event_interruptible(dev->done.wait,
-				       dev->done.done || kthread_should_stop());
+	rcuwait_wait_event(&dev->wait, dev->done || kthread_should_stop(), TASK_IDLE);
+
 	if (kthread_should_stop())
 		res = -EINTR;
-	if (res) {
-		pr_debug("%s:%u: interrupted %s\n", __func__, __LINE__, op);
-		return res;
-	}
 
 	if (dev->lv1_status) {
 		pr_err("%s:%u: %s not completed, status 0x%llx\n", __func__,