From patchwork Thu Oct 24 03:47:16 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nayna Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 1182623 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46zD8y3tnpz9sCJ for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:02:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46zD8y35ZgzDqTs for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:02:26 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46zCrf0cZJzDqRD for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:48:18 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46zCrd1bHjz8vDJ for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:48:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46zCrc6Zpsz9sQr; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:48:16 +1100 (AEDT) Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nayna@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46zCrc2Vt4z9sQm for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:48:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9O3l7sh142682 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:48:14 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vu3dr9g95-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:48:14 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:48:11 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:48:07 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9O3m5e537552304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 03:48:05 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1722AE056; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 03:48:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01B3AE053; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 03:48:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.40.192.65]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 03:48:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Nayna Jain To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v9 7/8] ima: check against blacklisted hashes for files with modsig Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:47:16 -0500 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191024034717.70552-1-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <20191024034717.70552-1-nayna@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19102403-0016-0000-0000-000002BC7C33 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19102403-0017-0000-0000-0000331DBEC5 Message-Id: <20191024034717.70552-8-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-24_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910240033 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Prakhar Srivastava , Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Ricther , Nayna Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Claudio Carvalho , Matthew Garret , Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , Elaine Palmer , Oliver O'Halloran , George Wilson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Asymmetric private keys are used to sign multiple files. The kernel currently support checking against blacklisted keys. However, if the public key is blacklisted, any file signed by the blacklisted key will automatically fail signature verification. We might not want to blacklist all the files signed by a particular key, but just a single file. Blacklisting the public key is not fine enough granularity. This patch adds support for checking against the blacklisted hash of the file based on the IMA policy. The blacklisted hash is the file hash without the appended signature. Defined is a new policy option "appraise_flag=check_blacklist". In addition to the blacklisted binary hashes stored in the firmware "dbx" variable, the Linux kernel may be configured to load blacklisted binary hashes onto the .blacklist keyring as well. The following example shows how to blacklist a kernel module. $ sha256sum kernel/kheaders.ko 77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3 kern el/kheaders.ko $ grep BLACKLIST .config # CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING is not set CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING=y CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST="blacklist-hash-list" $ cat certs/blacklist-hash-list "bin:77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3" Update the IMA custom measurement and appraisal policy rules (/etc/ima-policy): measure func=MODULE_CHECK template=ima-modsig appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_flag=check_blacklist appraise_type=imasig|modsig After building, installing, and rebooting the kernel: # keyctl show %keyring:.blacklist | grep 77fa889b35a05 545660333 ---lswrv 0 0 \_ blacklist: bin:77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3 # cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/policy | grep MODULE_CHECK measure func=MODULE_CHECK template=ima-modsig appraise func=MODULE_CHECK appraise_flag=check_blacklist appraise_type=imasig|modsig # modprobe kheaders modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kheaders': Permission denied # cat /sys/kernel/security/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements 10 0c9834db5a0182c1fb0cdc5d3adcf11a11fd83dd ima-sig sha256:3bc6ed4f0b4d6e31bc1dbc9ef844605abc7afdc6d81a57d77a1ec9407997c40 2 /usr/lib/modules/5.4.0-rc3+/kernel/kernel/kheaders.ko 10 82aad2bcc3fa8ed94762356b5c14838f3bcfa6a0 ima-modsig sha256:3bc6ed4f0b4d6e31bc1dbc9ef844605abc7afdc6d81a57d77a1ec9407997c40 2 /usr/lib/modules/5.4.0rc3+/kernel/kernel/kheaders.ko sha256:77fa889b3 5a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3 3082029a06092a864886f70d010702a082028b30820287020101310d300b0609608648 016503040201300b06092a864886f70d01070131820264.... 10 25b72217cc1152b44b134ce2cd68f12dfb71acb3 ima-buf sha256:8b58427fedcf8f4b20bc8dc007f2e232bf7285d7b93a66476321f9c2a3aa132 b blacklisted-hash 77fa889b35a05338ec52e51591c1b89d4c8d1c99a21251d7c22b1a8642a6bad3 Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 4 ++++ security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 8 +++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 12 ++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 ++++++++-- security/integrity/integrity.h | 1 + 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index 29ebe9afdac4..29aaedf33246 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Description: lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=] [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio] + [appraise_flag=] base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][CREDS_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK] [FIRMWARE_CHECK] [KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK] @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ Description: fowner:= decimal value lsm: are LSM specific option: appraise_type:= [imasig] [imasig|modsig] + appraise_flag:= [check_blacklist] + Currently, blacklist check is only for files signed with appended + signature. template:= name of a defined IMA template type (eg, ima-ng). Only valid when action is "measure". pcr:= decimal value diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index a65772ffa427..df4ca482fb53 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v); #define IMA_APPRAISE_KEXEC 0x40 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE +int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr); int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, @@ -271,6 +273,12 @@ int ima_read_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct evm_ima_xattr_data **xattr_value); #else +static inline int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 136ae4e0ee92..300c8d2943c5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "ima.h" @@ -303,6 +304,38 @@ static int modsig_verify(enum ima_hooks func, const struct modsig *modsig, return rc; } +/* + * ima_check_blacklist - determine if the binary is blacklisted. + * + * Add the hash of the blacklisted binary to the measurement list, based + * on policy. + * + * Returns -EPERM if the hash is blacklisted. + */ +int ima_check_blacklist(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, + const struct modsig *modsig, int pcr) +{ + enum hash_algo hash_algo; + const u8 *digest = NULL; + u32 digestsize = 0; + int rc = 0; + + if (!(iint->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST)) + return 0; + + if (iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED && modsig) { + ima_get_modsig_digest(modsig, &hash_algo, &digest, &digestsize); + + rc = is_binary_blacklisted(digest, digestsize); + if ((rc == -EPERM) && (iint->flags & IMA_MEASURE)) + process_buffer_measurement(digest, digestsize, + "blacklisted-hash", NONE, + pcr); + } + + return rc; +} + /* * ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement * diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index fe0b704ffdeb..13a0d64580ef 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig, pcr, template_desc); if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) { - inode_lock(inode); - rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len, modsig); - inode_unlock(inode); + rc = ima_check_blacklist(iint, modsig, pcr); + if (rc != -EPERM) { + inode_lock(inode); + rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, + pathname, xattr_value, + xattr_len, modsig); + inode_unlock(inode); + } if (!rc) rc = mmap_violation_check(func, file, &pathbuf, &pathname, filename); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 5380aca2b351..f19a895ad7cd 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -765,8 +765,8 @@ enum { Opt_fsuuid, Opt_uid_eq, Opt_euid_eq, Opt_fowner_eq, Opt_uid_gt, Opt_euid_gt, Opt_fowner_gt, Opt_uid_lt, Opt_euid_lt, Opt_fowner_lt, - Opt_appraise_type, Opt_permit_directio, - Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err + Opt_appraise_type, Opt_appraise_flag, + Opt_permit_directio, Opt_pcr, Opt_template, Opt_err }; static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { @@ -798,6 +798,7 @@ static const match_table_t policy_tokens = { {Opt_euid_lt, "euid<%s"}, {Opt_fowner_lt, "fowner<%s"}, {Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"}, + {Opt_appraise_flag, "appraise_flag=%s"}, {Opt_permit_directio, "permit_directio"}, {Opt_pcr, "pcr=%s"}, {Opt_template, "template=%s"}, @@ -1172,6 +1173,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) else result = -EINVAL; break; + case Opt_appraise_flag: + ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from); + if (strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist")) + entry->flags |= IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST; + break; case Opt_permit_directio: entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO; break; @@ -1500,6 +1506,8 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) else seq_puts(m, "appraise_type=imasig "); } + if (entry->flags & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST) + seq_puts(m, "appraise_flag=check_blacklist "); if (entry->flags & IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO) seq_puts(m, "permit_directio "); rcu_read_unlock(); diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h index d9323d31a3a8..73fc286834d7 100644 --- a/security/integrity/integrity.h +++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #define EVM_IMMUTABLE_DIGSIG 0x08000000 #define IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS 0x10000000 #define IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED 0x20000000 +#define IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST 0x40000000 #define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT | \ IMA_HASH | IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)