From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:04 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p86q5bz9z9s9T for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:28:35 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xm48M3KR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p86q4L12zDqNW for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:28:35 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xm48M3KR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zt0f94zDqNd for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LJ031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:17 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LJ031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989678; bh=dlukBYO6sgrMJOkaTgBisXwB5sU3qv4thlZ8O2ehfGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xm48M3KRfOyJ5kQVTw4Ovn149SHzUzjXnB91gR/MwjfLF0ptp5BEUN0KLVknYLbrp 2X/icDCYfRB9UYEbC3NAUGKwCdyo8dDDhGSx5tTGtY5HP4wqmdSP34dZKju4n+Gge+ 49so/3DvgiDJ/GVfMURchnCnlw9DNnZeiui7LkTskHswqEbB0x2gtSC2rxId3AjZBR GGo7gUXhxNWh5yHM3nD+kCXE9yK+n2f0qxD3hgG6HSsvsfV/vYDp6FrtitJ2VYs22S 56kVXNRMf3PkQZYnDbPEP33MV+F6/q6okJweuR2UIDtfb+ST3kPAUvQaC9zZcF4djh 8B1WciaXUL4Dw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] powerpc/mm/radix: mark __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:04 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following error is reported: arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__radix__flush_tlb_range_psize': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c index 6a23b9ebd2a1..a2b2848f0ae3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ void radix__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) tlb->need_flush_all = 0; } -static inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, +static __always_inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int psize, bool also_pwc) {