From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:02 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089027 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Hd4VTNz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:36:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="CHPtc9jS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Hd271nzDqCH for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:36:13 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="CHPtc9jS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8005YMvzDqMS for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LH031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:15 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LH031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989676; bh=6a2lxZ60QvbOnt17TfgaQyw8mxjsKyu0piFkGUEaJaM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CHPtc9jSL+9ebuZO/skz7KvegyF3HYZD/nb6/DUdMdujdL8RxU/elng/gx9lj7zmN 3LS//0ivw+/Lk89IGnZjJkOdZyR47Hr8cuKKAf9OB2cw7QwCfosqxN7q9/NSvjLQcu gswk62JqD1xBPGrZr5R5e7bwFyb8X9fRto9UW4pYcvEXoyrV1Qj9H5ghciINvvuaOZ LOES2rW0cy4ghzpgTXNZgj2B7dO7gvFk1/HK8GGyehvEr5qGYAXvqhC4ffi6lQOJ43 Q6j9nhdCfBQNAj49iioj3TEtmPutjuAz9A6aQXI2YIiNFK8b5AQoiP+KVg1lECf/fc HUrKflwhtfxWQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: mark setup_machine_tags() stub as __init __noreturn Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:02 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-7-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for arm, Clang build results in the following modpost warning: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1124): Section mismatch in reference from the function setup_machine_tags() to the function .init.text:early_print() The function setup_machine_tags() references the function __init early_print(). This is often because setup_machine_tags lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of early_print is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - new patch arch/arm/kernel/atags.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h index 201100226301..067e12edc341 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags); const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr); #else -static inline const struct machine_desc * +static inline const struct machine_desc * __init __noreturn setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr) { early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n");