From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:20:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8BC72CBz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:31:31 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="I0CioBDT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8BC5Z3wzDqM5 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:31:31 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="I0CioBDT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zt6CQ6zDqNn for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LE031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:11 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LE031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989672; bh=WxeGjpwIMtUh4NapkUcSoliRiI5DD/Rdf3zwHkix9l0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I0CioBDTkc1GHuaVSUtq8jVEnHXnq1hGY5fDTmiT2yZDSu6CTfVaaVXOU2ocZq0yd yau4zui0pA9Gklyfdi8o/AJZ0Ym0WBMT+wi/ZHIchu3uqVfAfpQFmT6dC6tCX/Ecrl cvxzp/A3CvHBT2XR5HyFgtORaimjq81j8GYVV04h9nnnWkEIg7LZQoh4wdOFskjT2d 5eeCSxlqfwdPytf+3xnWAoqknX7CikjegNqgQuyxt3anZOWoLqsxIgU6AOl4i9IKb9 pVYIeb0NCpH/BeB18yE5PgIoZGN8m8fwFMGMGGUgfjYtgwRleo8ZKHDsJzkNe/clDM UU4f0eSYQFKRQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 03/10] s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:20:59 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-4-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for s390, the following error is reported: In file included from arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c:19: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query': ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile( ^~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h index 3cc52e37b4b2..f316de40e51b 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode) } } -static inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) +static __always_inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) { if (__cpacf_check_opcode(opcode)) { __cpacf_query(opcode, mask);