From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:20:58 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8584NVBz9sBV for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="RQl+05KO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p85834XCzDq9p for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:08 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="RQl+05KO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zm6pFSzDqNC for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LD031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:10 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LD031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989671; bh=Uo1hU/pOzqv1Q6UwWPC8xpA1XS41uzJeh8wwHc0qw10=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RQl+05KOKoPFyxSI2FuyZ89MGQq0gLVxtR0GWFgEWNRsXcCy0ywyMCoApyQXmEl2n io077/9bKRr3TeYS3JcPQpAgG+CgbDwSbEuJjT7Lmm7Jw6tR92Yz0nQViiui/FvOYz OHEdmjKD4ngKPNZFO6+CjberrgaPoe16v9aVfe5TB6AkQWrH8BAv1i7oqy5w8xLaj2 RzbqB8+k+ccjgH7NZYljMP+UkT7M08F+jN4dlBRwqq5ZGhZlN6W78e7n79Ti0CPVAz o9Klq/jAOFriEnk7sGfoNu3h+Jeytk82FTnBT3j7jCa2JpKnKNKSS7Hd5r/0KKb6Z/ rdh6GlVxkt4pA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 02/10] MIPS: mark mult_sh_align_mod() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:20:58 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-3-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for mips, the following error is reported: arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c: In function 'mult_sh_align_mod.constprop': arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c index bada74af7641..c04b97aace4a 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ static inline void align_mod(const int align, const int mod) : "n"(align), "n"(mod)); } -static inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, - const int align, const int mod) +static __always_inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, + const int align, const int mod) { unsigned long flags; int m1, m2;