From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:06 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089029 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Lr4qV9z9s9T for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:39:00 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="mCn02M/+"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Lr3kzQzDqP8 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:39:00 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="mCn02M/+"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8022gFMzDqMT for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LL031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:19 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LL031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989680; bh=YGW0gg01jtKnXbnK1Ap0mVZ9GqJOY8DcvskWgXT4tQY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mCn02M/+Zs1tTrnfj5kcK/rIXu8Qjzpou6KA7O8+YMQxaTRIOmJiYSdn1yiI2naKt MOHV0re8MJvGrURubZ52FRJWYB8BKJDCHdtm0+gi/mtbUq5QKLWZPGOju5xSwUZcWl v62g+gXthE8J+NAD4NPy45+MxSmZ7tonTDzlWDzHGQzYMmZaYvOa54z3WQuT8Zuufn RRLTWAFT4J9sYGariQ0SfM01A/+8PRgOu0jsL4gPe489CoMR6D8YJvBgVXCuHjnXp7 ss+JT31y4kchSzLW7k/zDncSQUjZSSKhKjjg3CKu47It7stLcp72/4twqXDWyaFFPZ vwoBCpY9sZvjQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 10/10] compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:06 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-11-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 60a3cdd06394 ("x86: add optimized inlining") introduced CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING, but it has been available only for x86. The idea is obviously arch-agnostic. This commit moves the config entry from arch/x86/Kconfig.debug to lib/Kconfig.debug so that all architectures can benefit from it. This can make a huge difference in kernel image size especially when CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled. For example, I got 3.5% smaller arm64 kernel for v5.1-rc1. dec file 18983424 arch/arm64/boot/Image.before 18321920 arch/arm64/boot/Image.after This also slightly improves the "Kernel hacking" Kconfig menu as e61aca5158a8 ("Merge branch 'kconfig-diet' from Dave Hansen') suggested; this config option would be a good fit in the "compiler option" menu. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Borislav Petkov --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 --- arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 14 -------------- include/linux/compiler_types.h | 3 +-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 14 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 62fc3fda1a05..f214bb5d60d8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -310,9 +310,6 @@ config ZONE_DMA32 config AUDIT_ARCH def_bool y if X86_64 -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING - def_bool y - config ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC def_bool y diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug index 15d0fbe27872..f730680dc818 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug @@ -266,20 +266,6 @@ config CPA_DEBUG ---help--- Do change_page_attr() self-tests every 30 seconds. -config OPTIMIZE_INLINING - bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'" - ---help--- - This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions - developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to - do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of - compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and - enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully - this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the - decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option - is there to test gcc for this. - - If unsure, say N. - config DEBUG_ENTRY bool "Debug low-level entry code" depends on DEBUG_KERNEL diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index ba814f18cb4c..19e58b9138a0 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -140,8 +140,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data { * Do not use __always_inline here, since currently it expands to inline again * (which would break users of __always_inline). */ -#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \ - !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) +#if !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) #define inline inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __gnu_inline \ __maybe_unused notrace #else diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 00dbcdbc9a0d..37402f210115 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK exported to $(INSTALL_HDR_PATH) (usually 'usr/include' in your build tree), to make sure they're suitable. +config OPTIMIZE_INLINING + bool "Allow compiler to uninline functions marked 'inline'" + help + This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions + developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to + do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of + compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and + enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully + this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the + decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option + is there to test gcc for this. + + If unsure, say N. + config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis" help