From patchwork Fri Mar 16 20:38:29 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 887144 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [103.22.144.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402yGZ6g3Qz9s7h for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:48:22 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402yGZ5M8yzDrCg for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:48:22 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402y4h085vzF1ZL for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:39:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w2GKdaKL079487 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:39:45 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2grkejbm5v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:39:45 -0400 Received: from localhost by e38.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:39:44 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.138) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:39:39 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w2GKdc6n11731422; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:39:38 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9979C78037; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:39:38 -0600 (MDT) Received: from morokweng.localdomain.com (unknown [9.85.199.230]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE4478038; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:39:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 04/12] ima: Introduce is_ima_sig() Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:38:29 -0300 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180316203837.10174-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180316203837.10174-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18031620-0028-0000-0000-0000094FE1E7 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00008686; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000254; SDB=6.01004029; UDB=6.00511020; IPR=6.00783318; MB=3.00020079; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-03-16 20:39:43 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18031620-0029-0000-0000-000039FEBBB3 Message-Id: <20180316203837.10174-5-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-03-16_13:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1803160243 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Jessica Yu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , David Howells , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Mimi Zohar , David Woodhouse , "Serge E. Hallyn" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" With the introduction of another IMA signature type (modsig), some places will need to check for both of them. It is cleaner to do that if there's a helper function to tell whether an xattr_value represents an IMA signature. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 5 +++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 7 +++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index 35fe91aa1fc9..4bafa6a97967 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -155,6 +155,11 @@ unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void); int ima_init_template(void); void ima_init_template_list(void); +static inline bool is_ima_sig(const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value) +{ + return xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG; +} + /* * used to protect h_table and sha_table */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index a6b2995b7d0b..01172eab297b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -325,15 +325,14 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, } else if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) { /* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */ if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) && - (!xattr_value || - xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) { + !is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) { if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint)) status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } /* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */ if (inode->i_size == 0 && iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE && - xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) { + is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) { status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } @@ -448,7 +447,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)) return -EINVAL; ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), - xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + is_ima_sig(xvalue)); result = 0; } return result; diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c index 5afaa53decc5..afb52a90e532 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, { struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = event_data->xattr_value; - if ((!xattr_value) || (xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) + if (!is_ima_sig(xattr_value)) return 0; return ima_write_template_field_data(xattr_value, event_data->xattr_len,