From patchwork Wed Oct 18 00:53:23 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thiago Jung Bauermann X-Patchwork-Id: 827395 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3yGvDF0MSWz9t3H for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:12:13 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3yGvDD6ByCzDrX7 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:12:12 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3yGtrC41R6zDrFy for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:54:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9I0rVeY048199 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:49 -0400 Received: from e12.ny.us.ibm.com (e12.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.202]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dnsgff733-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:49 -0400 Received: from localhost by e12.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:48 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.28) by e12.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.199) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:43 -0400 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v9I0shKL64028754; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:54:43 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EB411204B; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morokweng.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.160.64]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0EF112034; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:54:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 10/18] ima: Store measurement after appraisal Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:53:23 -0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.2 In-Reply-To: <20171018005331.2688-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20171018005331.2688-1-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17101800-0048-0000-0000-000001F74E3A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00007909; HX=3.00000241; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000237; SDB=6.00932661; UDB=6.00469692; IPR=6.00712951; BA=6.00005643; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00017583; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2017-10-18 00:54:48 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17101800-0049-0000-0000-000042E77DA0 Message-Id: <20171018005331.2688-11-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-17_15:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710180012 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jessica Yu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , David Howells , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , Dmitry Kasatkin , Thiago Jung Bauermann , Herbert Xu , Mimi Zohar , David Woodhouse , "Serge E. Hallyn" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" When module-style signatures appended at the end of files are supported for IMA appraisal, the code will fallback to the xattr signature if the appended one fails to verify. The problem is that we don't know whether we need to fallback to the xattr signature until the appraise step, and by then the measure step was already completed and would need to be done again in case the template includes the signature. To avoid this problem, do the appraisal first so that the correct signature is stored by the template in the measure step. Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann --- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index 747a4fd9e2de..8e96450e27f5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -242,12 +242,12 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size, if (!pathbuf) /* ima_rdwr_violation possibly pre-fetched */ pathname = ima_d_path(&file->f_path, &pathbuf, filename); - if (action & IMA_MEASURE) - ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname, - xattr_value, xattr_len, pcr); if (rc == 0 && (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)) rc = ima_appraise_measurement(func, iint, file, pathname, xattr_value, xattr_len, opened); + if (action & IMA_MEASURE) + ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname, + xattr_value, xattr_len, pcr); if (action & IMA_AUDIT) ima_audit_measurement(iint, pathname);