diff mbox

powerpc/icp-opal: Fix missing KVM case and harden replay

Message ID 20170116175853.2458-1-benh@kernel.crashing.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show

Commit Message

Benjamin Herrenschmidt Jan. 16, 2017, 5:58 p.m. UTC
The icp-opal call is missing the code from icp-native to recover
interrupts snatched by KVM. Without that, when running KVM, we can
get into a situation where an interrupt is lost and the CPU stuck
with an elevated CPPR.

Also harden replay by always checking the return from opal_int_eoi

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Balbir Singh Jan. 17, 2017, 6:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:58:53AM -0600, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The icp-opal call is missing the code from icp-native to recover
> interrupts snatched by KVM. Without that, when running KVM, we can
> get into a situation where an interrupt is lost and the CPU stuck
> with an elevated CPPR.
> 
> Also harden replay by always checking the return from opal_int_eoi
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---

Looks good to me

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Michael Ellerman Jan. 18, 2017, 12:10 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 17:58:53 UTC, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The icp-opal call is missing the code from icp-native to recover
> interrupts snatched by KVM. Without that, when running KVM, we can
> get into a situation where an interrupt is lost and the CPU stuck
> with an elevated CPPR.
> 
> Also harden replay by always checking the return from opal_int_eoi
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9728a7c8ab2f7a1c8d5c95278d2e4f

cheers
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c
index d38e86f..60c5765 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ 
 #include <asm/xics.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/opal.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
 
 static void icp_opal_teardown_cpu(void)
 {
@@ -39,7 +40,26 @@  static void icp_opal_flush_ipi(void)
 	 * Should we be flagging idle loop instead?
 	 * Or creating some task to be scheduled?
 	 */
-	opal_int_eoi((0x00 << 24) | XICS_IPI);
+	if (opal_int_eoi((0x00 << 24) | XICS_IPI) > 0)
+		force_external_irq_replay();
+}
+
+static unsigned int icp_opal_get_xirr(void)
+{
+	unsigned int kvm_xirr;
+	__be32 hw_xirr;
+	int64_t rc;
+
+	/* Handle an interrupt latched by KVM first */
+	kvm_xirr = kvmppc_get_xics_latch();
+	if (kvm_xirr)
+		return kvm_xirr;
+
+	/* Then ask OPAL */
+	rc = opal_int_get_xirr(&hw_xirr, false);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		return 0;
+	return be32_to_cpu(hw_xirr);
 }
 
 static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(void)
@@ -47,12 +67,8 @@  static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(void)
 	unsigned int xirr;
 	unsigned int vec;
 	unsigned int irq;
-	int64_t rc;
 
-	rc = opal_int_get_xirr(&xirr, false);
-	if (rc < 0)
-		return 0;
-	xirr = be32_to_cpu(xirr);
+	xirr = icp_opal_get_xirr();
 	vec = xirr & 0x00ffffff;
 	if (vec == XICS_IRQ_SPURIOUS)
 		return 0;
@@ -67,7 +83,8 @@  static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(void)
 	xics_mask_unknown_vec(vec);
 
 	/* We might learn about it later, so EOI it */
-	opal_int_eoi(xirr);
+	if (opal_int_eoi(xirr) > 0)
+		force_external_irq_replay();
 
 	return 0;
 }