@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int virtfn_add(struct pci_dev *dev, int id, int reset)
virtfn->multifunction = 0;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
- res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
if (!res->parent)
continue;
virtfn->resource[i].name = pci_name(virtfn);
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
nres = 0;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
bars |= (1 << (i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES));
- res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
if (res->parent)
nres++;
}
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ found:
nres = 0;
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
- res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
bar64 = __pci_read_base(dev, pci_bar_unknown, res,
pos + PCI_SRIOV_BAR + i * 4);
if (!res->flags)
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ found:
failed:
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
- res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
res->flags = 0;
}
Most of PCI uses "res = &dev->resource[i]", not "res = dev->resource + i". Use that style in iov.c also. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> --- drivers/pci/iov.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)