From patchwork Fri Sep 27 14:25:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nayna Jain X-Patchwork-Id: 1168590 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fvql4XhKz9s4Y for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:50:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fvqk6w6PzDqsh for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:50:58 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fvJS6t9kzDqxX for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fvJR5BnDz8swt for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 46fvJR3bkcz9sQn; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:19 +1000 (AEST) Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nayna@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fvJQ64Svz9sPk for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:27:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8REMA9v037463 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:17 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v8w271wuh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:27:16 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:27:14 +0100 Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.26.192) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:27:10 +0100 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8REQeH235389754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:26:40 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0EBA4054; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660FCA4062; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from swastik.ibm.com (unknown [9.80.207.173]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:27:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Nayna Jain To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] ima: deprecate permit_directio, instead use appraise_flag Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:25:59 -0400 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> References: <1569594360-7141-1-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19092714-4275-0000-0000-0000036BD008 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092714-4276-0000-0000-0000387E527D Message-Id: <1569594360-7141-9-git-send-email-nayna@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-09-27_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909270134 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Ricther , Nayna Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar , Claudio Carvalho , Matthew Garret , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , Elaine Palmer , Oliver O'Halloran , George Wilson Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This patch deprecates the existing permit_directio flag, instead adds it as possible value to appraise_flag parameter. For eg. appraise_flag=permit_directio Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain --- Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy | 4 ++-- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy index 4c97afcc0f3c..9a2a140dc561 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ Description: [euid=] [fowner=] [fsname=]] lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=] [obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]] - option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio] - [appraise_flag=[check_blacklist]] + option: [[appraise_type=]] [template=] [permit_directio(deprecated)] + [appraise_flag=[check_blacklist]|[permit_directio]] base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][CREDS_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK] [FIRMWARE_CHECK] [KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK] [KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK] diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index ad3b3af69460..d9df54c75d46 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -1177,6 +1177,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_flag", args[0].from); if (strstr(args[0].from, "blacklist")) entry->flags |= IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST; + if (strstr(args[0].from, "permit_directio")) + entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO; break; case Opt_permit_directio: entry->flags |= IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO;