From patchwork Sun Dec 9 15:00:20 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mike Rapoport X-Patchwork-Id: 1009977 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CV0Z3Nnfz9s3l for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:06:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CV0Z1PwvzDqZV for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:06:38 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=rppt@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43CTsr69tdzDqxQ for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 02:00:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wB9ExNb4193426 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:00:46 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2p8v3dxvdt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 10:00:45 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:43 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:37 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id wB9F0a1633357934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:36 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A5542041; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954442045; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.8.213]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 15:00:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rapoport-lnx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 09 Dec 2018 17:00:32 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] microblaze: prefer memblock API returning virtual address Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:00:20 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1544367624-15376-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> References: <1544367624-15376-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18120915-4275-0000-0000-000002EE2656 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18120915-4276-0000-0000-000037FB3E6E Message-Id: <1544367624-15376-3-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-12-09_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=591 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812090139 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Michal Hocko , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Rich Felker , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Chen , Jonas Bonn , linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Russell King , Mike Rapoport , Mark Salter , Arnd Bergmann , Stefan Kristiansson , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Greentime Hu , Stafford Horne , Guan Xuetao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Rather than use the memblock_alloc_base that returns a physical address and then convert this address to the virtual one, use appropriate memblock function that returns a virtual address. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport Tested-by: Michal Simek --- arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c index b17fd8a..44f4b89 100644 --- a/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/microblaze/mm/init.c @@ -363,8 +363,9 @@ void __init *early_get_page(void) * Mem start + kernel_tlb -> here is limit * because of mem mapping from head.S */ - return __va(memblock_alloc_base(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, - memory_start + kernel_tlb)); + return memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, + MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT, memory_start + kernel_tlb, + NUMA_NO_NODE); } #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */