From patchwork Thu Oct 18 22:46:29 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Frank Rowand X-Patchwork-Id: 986385 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42blJ41v6Pz9sBq for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:15:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fkcCiNJ9"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42blJ40JmgzF3Kr for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:15:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fkcCiNJ9"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::441; helo=mail-pf1-x441.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fkcCiNJ9"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x441.google.com (mail-pf1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::441]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42bkjH632szF3G8 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:48:19 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x441.google.com with SMTP id j23-v6so15548097pfi.4 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:48:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=fkcCiNJ9iEYgfJCEzDWYAdkeW84uc0JXDSBicUmWgvDvbjdMx+/AvMYzXJbKjCagek vaQJWcopNfOSlyItXEqrY0J7+qHjTid0KVlBV5SzpZW1yCZAbth2Rr3fG02QTaRyTqOO inl5ePnmUc38ejQEJ8zvOlkMD6Av7kUr96lt6RfHn8X9Wt2Gcwqr9KhAvpMWqOwkxSV8 XivSRmLZNm+CBwT2Ms0xeeQTAcE8ktnZd39KArkpgOKvbEhOYxon7zJRUZsl8BJfIGY+ G6AmKNRKYQXHKgs4EQG0QK0rISJJzuy1SjCfRmp8LqmvVATe1spatFS16GGIkvZ88i5R zUAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=1eIq+bpAJjW92EtiaqYATBx5CfeVYNbB6/35CF3TsEg=; b=T/ltLw5OgoWbM7pNexCM8Vptl8ni7lPgDuWcD2IgeSD6MF1OWMtotlSfgaPuKhgFW3 oeQVNVRLoWvBQT2OaGN4VacWrFLXKD4J72CS20dx8GTKBT5/X7KaCkeOXSH0Nbs9hoN9 KusAceE3noQ0b/AVh4e7Ak8I/LvW5Jg5QNZCqyYWsg103ZTa2yIpR+q+gSnwvJjAKHIg j6NTrHhC51TF5mijASN4acTcyBF5Wcq6CUII523iKZkwLr+0ekH5u9IJwC8Ug/CA4/ub 3ubHexdyGMBJY1FS562rwnh6Fw7OS8rbllE4/EvRGSgQf1VF2L67b6JEPFV63q72SxWH Avgw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogRsMJ52/oWIaRjFEmdXMgI0PTXad5ZYkfdd5qYrPmELngUgXyl TlG2CabtrrymTWC/CuPe0j8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60VhO8ZLuoB5COQd3Li9qrJzOeBPJfQgDCh06RUoKgnwtpj/b5Hb/KcaYt/+sfEuTvf/6G+Uw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:ac1:: with SMTP id 62-v6mr6383653pfk.90.1539902897730; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:48:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v81-v6sm38129268pfj.25.2018.10.18.15.48.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:48:17 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH v5 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:46:29 -0700 Message-Id: <1539902796-8382-12-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1539902796-8382-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1539902796-8382-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Multiple overlay fragments adding or deleting the same node is not supported. An attempt to do so results in an incorrect devicetree. The node name will be munged for the second add. After adding this patch, the unittest messages will show: Duplicate name in motor-1, renamed to "controller#1" OF: overlay: of_overlay_apply() err=0 ### dt-test ### of_overlay_fdt_apply() expected -22, ret=0, overlay_bad_add_dup_node ### dt-test ### FAIL of_unittest_overlay_high_level():2419 Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed ... ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 210 passed, 1 failed The incorrect (munged) node name "controller#1" can be seen in the /proc filesystem: $ pwd /proc/device-tree/testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 $ ls compatible controller controller#1 name phandle spin $ ls controller power_bus $ ls controller#1 power_bus_emergency Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 1 + .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 ++++ 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 013d85e694c6..166dbdbfd1c5 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_12.dtb.o \ overlay_13.dtb.o \ overlay_15.dtb.o \ + overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ overlay_base.dtb.o diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..145dfc3b1024 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +/* + * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * + * Thus the new node "controller" in each fragment will + * result in an attempt to add the same node twice. + * This will result in an error and the overlay apply + * will fail. + */ + +&electric_1 { + + motor-1 { + controller { + power_bus = < 0x1 0x2 >; + }; + }; +}; + +&spin_ctrl_1 { + controller { + power_bus_emergency = < 0x101 0x102 >; + }; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 722537e14848..471b8eb6e842 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2147,6 +2147,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_12); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); @@ -2169,6 +2170,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_12, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), {} @@ -2413,6 +2415,9 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_node", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n");