From patchwork Tue Oct 16 02:37:21 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Frank Rowand X-Patchwork-Id: 984490 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42Z05J5CrSz9sCW for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:44:36 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VuFBfJMM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42Z05J3mmjzF3Wv for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:44:36 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VuFBfJMM"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::541; helo=mail-pg1-x541.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VuFBfJMM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42Yzz63dSKzF3Vy for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:39:14 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id y18-v6so10094685pge.0 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:39:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=JHz4eQu2QicbBVTkAKqK9aKvo2anD2RJn53w2YKB8e0=; b=VuFBfJMMk6qap6AVKX2Sa0pM5k7L/UmMs/xnds8HFlzeaKdsJeXdUwLD2/9HDsaiFW seUTu1j/+Jmg/V0TiRXDN4wlnkR1IhBWg0HE0LLVmRiZOktbYOWPhcTjC8iLMGXNZUoU vJRC4VIPI0l25gLyTwBMd88ETXtp7zaHREELU6ea5fGnYADBdJ5oHQxD4u3dS5/Adh3C xWwfP6bblrpgPVwKA0Dc8WmAMypiKsEkbI/yn0DLH8zz60jRGIOtEFXsTeb3BeFwebXk GwiL7n4Jjyqb/hHdRQjXlXHDbEfxBOCTQTZdFNx+duZTvaySIpzKDtPGGHM2synn1l0y uPhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=JHz4eQu2QicbBVTkAKqK9aKvo2anD2RJn53w2YKB8e0=; b=pA/vqT03rEz42/mZJDGD+3OwtYxKSULYc82lGO23+R13Rqsbf96nkG3iZpDX1IQltp IMUhBZy/yaCDEhpM+n2F8jukSNjJH51CTzT1Xknmi820A5PUfdZwzIvLRFuqnnYnJK5y Zx2IgnN8YGCUzBXCY9eDVAAR+iveG2C2EvetLj7tFn54qf4IT7YRYTf56/3KXwV6ZQAm wWnWtwYTuuJ/Rv9QeE2P6ml1xw3UPpW6XSp8StMjzJMewNbSrpqPitsvYAPVqfm4L++k 65YipjKF8oSkl4ecyGbFyydKfZrWJOva4VYCewZojGCGZXrMPHTkrws8UlTsaHNhsOnQ 6L8w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoikBhiE4BvNhY58wLECM361VIkf/dWmI8ttcm7KvlNL1aFCb1VN jBVXPdE8QC1Wg3yoJ2XezpM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV639CBmDpGh7IxP36f5mNtBe8sg3FSECUCzIxDTxhGjWl2qLULnogvgzhlm+V2d/huyFocVcgg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1d16:: with SMTP id d22-v6mr1132680pfd.159.1539657552452; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u79-v6sm18620287pfd.117.2018.10.15.19.39.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:39:11 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH v4 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 19:37:21 -0700 Message-Id: <1539657458-24401-2-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1539657458-24401-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1539657458-24401-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Add checks: - attempted kfree due to refcount reaching zero before overlay is removed - properties linked to an overlay node when the node is removed - node refcount > one during node removal in a changeset destroy, if the node was created by the changeset After applying this patch, several validation warnings will be reported from the devicetree unittest during boot due to pre-existing devicetree bugs. The warnings will be similar to: OF: ERROR: of_node_release() overlay node /testcase-data/overlay-node/test-bus/test-unittest11/test-unittest111 contains unexpected properties OF: ERROR: memory leak - destroy cset entry: attach overlay node /testcase-data-2/substation@100/hvac-medium-2 expected refcount 1 instead of 2. of_node_get() / of_node_put() are unbalanced for this node. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- Changes since v3: - Add expected value of refcount for destroy cset entry error. Also explain the cause of the error. drivers/of/dynamic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/of/overlay.c | 1 + include/linux/of.h | 15 ++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c index f4f8ed9b5454..24c97b7a050f 100644 --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c @@ -330,6 +330,25 @@ void of_node_release(struct kobject *kobj) if (!of_node_check_flag(node, OF_DYNAMIC)) return; + if (of_node_check_flag(node, OF_OVERLAY)) { + + if (!of_node_check_flag(node, OF_OVERLAY_FREE_CSET)) { + /* premature refcount of zero, do not free memory */ + pr_err("ERROR: memory leak %s() overlay node %pOF before free overlay changeset\n", + __func__, node); + return; + } + + /* + * If node->properties non-empty then properties were added + * to this node either by different overlay that has not + * yet been removed, or by a non-overlay mechanism. + */ + if (node->properties) + pr_err("ERROR: %s() overlay node %pOF contains unexpected properties\n", + __func__, node); + } + property_list_free(node->properties); property_list_free(node->deadprops); @@ -434,6 +453,16 @@ struct device_node *__of_node_dup(const struct device_node *np, static void __of_changeset_entry_destroy(struct of_changeset_entry *ce) { + if (ce->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE && + of_node_check_flag(ce->np, OF_OVERLAY)) { + if (kref_read(&ce->np->kobj.kref) > 1) { + pr_err("ERROR: memory leak - destroy cset entry: attach overlay node %pOF expected refcount 1 instead of %d. of_node_get() / of_node_put() are unbalanced for this node.\n", + ce->np, kref_read(&ce->np->kobj.kref)); + } else { + of_node_set_flag(ce->np, OF_OVERLAY_FREE_CSET); + } + } + of_node_put(ce->np); list_del(&ce->node); kfree(ce); diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c index eda57ef12fd0..1176cb4b6e4e 100644 --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c @@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ static int add_changeset_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, return -ENOMEM; tchild->parent = target_node; + of_node_set_flag(tchild, OF_OVERLAY); ret = of_changeset_attach_node(&ovcs->cset, tchild); if (ret) diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h index 4d25e4f952d9..aa1dafaec6ae 100644 --- a/include/linux/of.h +++ b/include/linux/of.h @@ -138,11 +138,16 @@ static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { } extern struct device_node *of_stdout; extern raw_spinlock_t devtree_lock; -/* flag descriptions (need to be visible even when !CONFIG_OF) */ -#define OF_DYNAMIC 1 /* node and properties were allocated via kmalloc */ -#define OF_DETACHED 2 /* node has been detached from the device tree */ -#define OF_POPULATED 3 /* device already created for the node */ -#define OF_POPULATED_BUS 4 /* of_platform_populate recursed to children of this node */ +/* + * struct device_node flag descriptions + * (need to be visible even when !CONFIG_OF) + */ +#define OF_DYNAMIC 1 /* (and properties) allocated via kmalloc */ +#define OF_DETACHED 2 /* detached from the device tree */ +#define OF_POPULATED 3 /* device already created */ +#define OF_POPULATED_BUS 4 /* platform bus created for children */ +#define OF_OVERLAY 5 /* allocated for an overlay */ +#define OF_OVERLAY_FREE_CSET 6 /* in overlay cset being freed */ #define OF_BAD_ADDR ((u64)-1)