From patchwork Mon Oct 15 00:24:25 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Frank Rowand X-Patchwork-Id: 983841 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42YKvr4Q74z9s7h for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:04:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="koc+J4MD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42YKvr2ChxzDqf9 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:04:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="koc+J4MD"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::442; helo=mail-pf1-x442.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="koc+J4MD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42YK4B0FYgzF0Vv for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:26:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id 78-v6so6382433pfq.0 for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=wiP1rYr32Lf/QXaWyA9yA91bv6hFIJaCasE1H+3zy38=; b=koc+J4MDojZpcz36xvOSkjoqfevRszDz3UqfQY+rfB37qfKorTU9rO4a0pWj4I5KTc 0UYqguaolPopPFCFbLg9bP0MJOXwLkW7aPjTg7aZsbEHFLY/LR5a9Iv88JLEAhvp22YA cqv98ZiU2WrRmGxx5nmP3RSBt050epgcevrsltleuS9+X6s07r3dNbMF73RU90cTfToG S5FL3aFnbyjCZ3G2PL0cqm2yh39B8AqoKVOFHTnOtHQjSuHmPqDkYSUvze4KHdJEZY6j GU6X88P/OVxdkVNz2xi98McNgCeL+cI10zrZ7DbPHGr8cYjRivF/OYwFWofJ0/WC+V0u dV3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=wiP1rYr32Lf/QXaWyA9yA91bv6hFIJaCasE1H+3zy38=; b=Sq9GQGUZZ9OCluGrGa4gDukLEVzQmfPS1SDVrw7gDT1gt2Owpc4opzaL63axJBuNBC lsDJL7E1iHWQa2dGd8QQqwqOAklAUyBxcbzsXiLfT5USBKOs13WZxwTInwF9ieehrUTd /f4LV6nAPozqXqlGHqAseiJ7jlOmhtqIphmOEQumSYF9jAtdVgD3lfUNPk65Pq5nT3O4 QtB7y/oRt/gVuHnyxRU9YNXaN0CRawsV8LliGUKpGdZv4rj9nW76khRJuc0v9TH2XNs7 PHSE1yWHd3kukMEcGrorpIqNc3Ng65+vcEEgl9AdXliqWhSaIKQV0cvwTOB40dPoxti9 78cg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogu2OqiviGFQOZggkk8yDuostR/9nLuF/bPYCk5wOU00JSpiSMM MHYJLr1Viht/J/Rt9dEaru8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63kvseQYHhjyZLy3eAW/eJY77Hbvyfxp/HTbLvY4vVI5zr3xecqwY00JcTXJfwg+ikKq8o2Aw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b08:: with SMTP id 8-v6mr13870320pgl.130.1539563176346; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14-v6sm11387110pgh.52.2018.10.14.17.26.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , Pantelis Antoniou , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer Subject: [PATCH v3 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 17:24:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1539563070-12969-14-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1539563070-12969-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1539563070-12969-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Frank Rowand Add test case of two fragments updating the same property. After adding the test case, the system hangs at end of boot, after after slub stack dumps from kfree() in crypto modprobe code. Multiple overlay fragments adding, modifying, or deleting the same property is not supported. Add check to detect the attempt and fail the overlay apply. After applying this patch, the devicetree unittest messages will include: OF: overlay: ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add, update, and/or delete property /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1/rpm_avail ... ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 212 passed, 0 failed The check to detect two fragments updating the same property is folded into the patch that created the test case to maintain bisectability. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- Changes since v2: - Use continue to reduce indentation in find_dup_cset_node_entry() and find_dup_cset_prop() drivers/of/overlay.c | 118 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile | 1 + .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts | 24 +++++ drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts | 1 + drivers/of/unittest.c | 5 + 5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c index b0a0dafb6a13..908bcc62019b 100644 --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c @@ -514,52 +514,96 @@ static int build_changeset_symbols_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, return 0; } +static int find_dup_cset_node_entry(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1) +{ + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_2; + char *fn_1, *fn_2; + int node_path_match; + + if (ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) + return 0; + + ce_2 = ce_1; + list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { + if ((ce_2->action != OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE && + ce_2->action != OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) || + of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, ce_2->np->full_name)) + continue; + + fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); + fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); + node_path_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); + kfree(fn_1); + kfree(fn_2); + if (node_path_match) { + pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add and/or delete node %pOF\n", + ce_1->np); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + return 0; +} + +static int find_dup_cset_prop(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs, + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1) +{ + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_2; + char *fn_1, *fn_2; + int node_path_match; + + if (ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_REMOVE_PROPERTY && + ce_1->action != OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY) + return 0; + + ce_2 = ce_1; + list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { + if ((ce_2->action != OF_RECONFIG_ADD_PROPERTY && + ce_2->action != OF_RECONFIG_REMOVE_PROPERTY && + ce_2->action != OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY) || + of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, ce_2->np->full_name)) + continue; + + fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); + fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); + node_path_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); + kfree(fn_1); + kfree(fn_2); + if (node_path_match && + !of_prop_cmp(ce_1->prop->name, ce_2->prop->name)) { + pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add, update, and/or delete property %pOF/%s\n", + ce_1->np, ce_1->prop->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + return 0; +} + /** - * check_changeset_dup_add_node() - changeset validation: duplicate add node + * changeset_dup_entry_check() - check for duplicate entries * @ovcs: Overlay changeset * - * Check changeset @ovcs->cset for multiple add node entries for the same - * node. + * Check changeset @ovcs->cset for multiple {add or delete} node entries for + * the same node or duplicate {add, delete, or update} properties entries + * for the same property. * - * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM if memory allocation failure, or -EINVAL if - * invalid overlay in @ovcs->fragments[]. + * Returns 0 on success, or -EINVAL if duplicate changeset entry found. */ -static int check_changeset_dup_add_node(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) +static int changeset_dup_entry_check(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) { - struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1, *ce_2; - char *fn_1, *fn_2; - int name_match; + struct of_changeset_entry *ce_1; + int dup_entry = 0; list_for_each_entry(ce_1, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { - - if (ce_1->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE || - ce_1->action == OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) { - - ce_2 = ce_1; - list_for_each_entry_continue(ce_2, &ovcs->cset.entries, node) { - if (ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_ATTACH_NODE || - ce_2->action == OF_RECONFIG_DETACH_NODE) { - /* inexpensive name compare */ - if (!of_node_cmp(ce_1->np->full_name, - ce_2->np->full_name)) { - /* expensive full path name compare */ - fn_1 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_1->np); - fn_2 = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", ce_2->np); - name_match = !strcmp(fn_1, fn_2); - kfree(fn_1); - kfree(fn_2); - if (name_match) { - pr_err("ERROR: multiple overlay fragments add and/or delete node %pOF\n", - ce_1->np); - return -EINVAL; - } - } - } - } - } + dup_entry |= find_dup_cset_node_entry(ovcs, ce_1); + dup_entry |= find_dup_cset_prop(ovcs, ce_1); } - return 0; + return dup_entry ? -EINVAL : 0; } /** @@ -617,7 +661,7 @@ static int build_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) } } - return check_changeset_dup_add_node(ovcs); + return changeset_dup_entry_check(ovcs); } /* diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile index 166dbdbfd1c5..9b6807065827 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.dtb.o \ overlay_13.dtb.o \ overlay_15.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dtb.o \ + overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_phandle.dtb.o \ overlay_bad_symbol.dtb.o \ overlay_base.dtb.o diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c190da54f175 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +/plugin/; + +/* + * &electric_1/motor-1 and &spin_ctrl_1 are the same node: + * /testcase-data-2/substation@100/motor-1 + * + * Thus the property "rpm_avail" in each fragment will + * result in an attempt to update the same property twice. + * This will result in an error and the overlay apply + * will fail. + */ + +&electric_1 { + + motor-1 { + rpm_avail = < 100 >; + }; +}; + +&spin_ctrl_1 { + rpm_avail = < 100 200 >; +}; diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts index 820b79ca378a..99ab9d12d00b 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ spin_ctrl_1: motor-1 { compatible = "ot,ferris-wheel-motor"; spin = "clockwise"; + rpm_avail = < 50 >; }; spin_ctrl_2: motor-8 { diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index 471b8eb6e842..efd9c947f192 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2148,6 +2148,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_13); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_15); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_node); +OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); @@ -2171,6 +2172,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_13, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_15, 0), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_node, -EINVAL), + OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), {} @@ -2418,6 +2420,9 @@ static __init void of_unittest_overlay_high_level(void) unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_node", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_node' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_add_dup_prop", NULL), + "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_add_dup_prop' failed\n"); + unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_bad_phandle", NULL), "Adding overlay 'overlay_bad_phandle' failed\n");